Gender And Communication: Exemplar Question & Answer To Follow

The Matching Hypothesis of individuals selecting a mate that is within a similar range of attractiveness as themselves is a justifiable phenomenon. The more individuals share in common the more successful they are likely to be in their relationships. When a not-so-attractive man is seen with a gorgeous woman, one must assume that the less attractive individual, is able to make up for his shortcomings with other assets, such as money, power, or other desirable characteristics. Relationships outside the matching hypothesis seem to be less ideal due to the sense that each partner may feel that they are not with someone in their own league. This may lead to problems in the relationship because there is less in common when one feels entirely disconnected to the other individual, which is likely to happen when each is in an entirely different “league.”
Listening is a key factor in the communication process. Most people tend to talk more than listen, which is why communication problems tend to be common, especially in intimate relationships. There are distinct differences in the way men and women listen and communicate, which is important to understand for effective communication. Through authentic listening one can catch the back channel cues that would allow the individuals to be empathetic towards the other person. When listening is no occurring, this level of empathy is not attained.
Lastly, with regard to the Galvin and Patrick article, it is easy to see how commonality encourages workability. The two men in the article share a high degree of commonality, which increases their chances of a successful relationship. The communication process is much easier in this relationship due to the similar backdrop of each man’s life and choices. This similarity shows that the likelihood of success in their partnership will increase the likelihood of their success in parenting regardless of the fact that they are two white men adopting a black female child.