Introduction and Thesis
There are several changes in the world situation that the White House should be aware. Nations develop,nations split while others deteriorate economically; several changes need the attention Of the White House. In the analysis of future scenarios in the global community, several issues can be noted. The economic inequality scenario is pretty worrying for the United States government. The USA has not been successful in establishing equality of economy both locally and internationally. Security is expected to grow more problematic in future as a result. Establishing stable governance in nations that are prone to inequality in the economy is a solemn challenge for the white house too. In these countries, the inequality of income is expected to sparkle further indifferences hence security threat, and the white house should keep watch. Differences between nations over ideologies such as capitalism and communism can result to the cold war and even secret invasion of the pentagon systems. The paper will therefore, outline the sensitive scenarios as they appear in the global community in relation to income inequality and give an overview of what is expected from the white house (National Intelligence Council (U.S.), 2012).
Theoretical Approach(s)
Income inequality is a very sensitive issue in the present global community. Despite all the efforts by different jurisdictions to curb income inequality in the past and the present, there is still evidence that more cases of income inequality are expected to arise further. The theoretical concept of past existence for future threat applies in this case (Noah, 2013).
Security Interests
Income inequality is a threat to the security of the USA both at local and international levels. The moment a faction of people share the same habitation while others happen to be richer; there is always the threat of theft. The lower income people stand a high chance of threatening the security of the nation by involving in criminal activities (Kelly, 2009).
Economic Interests
The expenditure of money in this new age is a complex subject. The way in which a nation spends its finance determines and shapes the progress of income inequality. The United States government should get cautious on how it sets its priorities. Priorities should be driven towards stabilizing the nation by reducing the gap between the rich and the poor. However, when the government chooses to neglect prioritized spending then income inequality is set to advance in the future (International Monetary Fund., & International Monetary Fund, 2011).
Identity Interests
Income inequality is viewed by different organs in the country from different organs. There is no similarity between the view of the religious groups and the government about the issue of income inequality. The government has branded the issue as a real challenge but kept on promising to create the difference so soon. The religious organizations and other public bodies tend to feel that the government in its capacity can manage income inequality (Kelly, 2009).
Recommendations
The White House should be cautious about the issue of income inequality. However much the nation develops, in the absence of equality of income and social balance peace is expected to be an issue of the past. Violence is a result of income inequality. The government should work within its mandate to restore equality amongst its citizens (International Monetary Fund., & International Monetary Fund, 2011).
Conclusion
Income inequality is an expected scenario in the near future. It is a tricky subject since it consists of several aspects including identity, security, economy and several theoretical aspects. Income inequality as a future scenario is expected to rise with the trend of development in the USA and the global community as well. It is, therefore, the mandate of the government to ensure sets its agenda right for this bottleneck (Noah, 2013).
Reference
International Monetary Fund., & International Monetary Fund. (2011). Finance & Development, September 2011. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.
National Intelligence Council (U.S.). (2012). Global trends 2030: Alternative worlds: a publication of the National Intelligence Council. December 2012.
Noah, T. (2013). The great divergence: America's growing inequality crisis and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Kelly, N. J. (2009). The politics of income inequality in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
