Utilitarianism by the compliance manager
Introduction
Utilitarianism is the ability of one or a group to possess some knowledge by a given set of rules of by-laws that allows the human beings to achieve rationality of their minds (Bateman and Snell, 2013). The utilitarianism concept is only trying to outline the various procedures and acts that are vital in a person, company or a group’s decision-making process. In this case, the compliances manager makes the most of this pragmatic idea in formulating the rules and strategies in rehabilitating the expected adversaries in the plastic company functionality. The result is the availability to argue and make wise decisions from what angles and determination the subject is depending on in the fulfillment of the theme in the study. As a compliance manager, it is vital to have numerous strategies and skills that can allow the finding of a solution to the gas emissions from the company.
The government regulations and fines that can be imposed are catastrophic in the attainment of profits by the enterprise. The major role of a compliance manager is to navigate functions and connect them with the local and international business regulations. Act utilitarianism is embedded in trying to prove the factualness of the theoretical terms of the placement of acts and the principles that can be used to govern an institution (Christina & Somers, 2004).
Strategies for the Compliance Manager
For the ethical consideration in business, the rules and regulations in the international market for companies must be adhered to or make adjustments that will act as risk mitigation to match the required standards. The company staff and the executive will have to form meetings to discuss the cost and value effects that the company should incur concerning overcoming the expected challenge from environmental authority (Bateman and Snell, 2013).
Roles of compliance manager
Firstly, the role of a compliance manager will be the management of legal laws and the reputational risks associated with the government. In this case, the plastic Company in Maryland must make sure that the manager is well adverse with issues of global warming. The compliance manager must be a time-frame planner and a strategic leader. For instance, the leader should have a good knowledge on global warming at least for the last decade. The consequences of act utilitarianism, in this case, are that the benefits achieved are by the company’s standards right or wrong in a given particular decision by the compliance manager. The company has the capability of facing sanctions and even fines according to the result of the study measures. Much of the carbon emissions from this industry can be well reduced by employing new technologies in manufacturing by reducing the labor force that can lead to more savings on revenue (Christina & Somers, 2004). Secondly, a compliance manager should be anticipative of the demands and the changing trends in the company. By having an intelligent, intuitive and a flexible mind, it allows the manager easy time in formulating new methods and objectives of managing the foreseen problems. The manager has to abide by the manufacturing laws at Maryland such that, the technologies to be adopted must be qualified for a more environmental-friendly organization. The officer engages in quality assurance thereby making sure that the plastic products are certified and restrict the limits of global warming control team statistics such that it can be processed after the compliance manager has verified it via the respective authorities (Bateman and Snell, 2013).
It can be a source of investments and surplus revenue created by the diversion of toxic carbonic gasses in the atmosphere (Bateman and Snell, 2013).There are many risks associated with compliance and non-compliant companies. The legal and professional risks by businesses can cause havoc to any organizational development. Thus, the officer of conformity tries always to be up to date with the changing environmental trends. There is never time to wait for change but to make the change by putting forth robust measures and strategies to curb the challenges expected in the next years to come for an industry to act accordingly. The manager is responsible for reporting to the Chief executives and directors of the organization on such new issues about environmental changes (Christina & Somers, 2004).
Secondly, the compliance officer has the duty of creating a communicative process between the executive and the staff. It can be on the new developments and the changes to be made regarding the labor force and the new technological advancements. The practical and ethical standards of an institution are the primary jobs of a compliance officer. The act and regulations are bent on the equality and measures of company performance. The director coordinates the roles and rules followed by each of the employees in the chemical company. The manager is responsible for the avoidance of lawsuits in such cases that are foreseen by the research personnel. The result is aimed at reducing the incidences of lawsuits by the manufacturing authorities in Maryland over negligence to the new carbon-emission laws. The outcome will see profitable deals being struck by the efforts of mitigating risks at an early stage through proper planning and strategic evaluation of problems (Bateman and Snell, 2013).
The culture and aims of the company are always in the mind of the compliance manager so that new alterations are easily noticed. The staff and the persons in the plastic manufacturing are installed with skills; values and ethical practice that allow them become adaptive and innovative regarding the changing natural patterns. The impact would see a reliable staff and a good mechanization and utilization of all the levels of management in production (Christina & Somers, 2004).
Qualities of a manager and the impacts
A compliance officer also requires the attributes of fairness, principality, honesty and diligence so as to maintain the ethical codes of conducts in the company. For example, if the organization would wish to adopt new technologies to curb the carbon emissions, the officer is in charge of collecting information and spearheading the relationship between the regulating authority and the company (Christina & Somers, 2004). The concerned is also responsible for the mandatory seeking of explanations from the staff on the matters arising in the environmental changes. In the plastic company, the officer is in charge of the various laboratory tests and the analysis of the industrial waste (carbon emissions).
This nature helps the company to know and adopt quickly according to the new laws set by the manufacturing institutions of Maryland. In this regard, the act and regulation utilitarian concepts can both be applied in disseminating rules and patterns of innovations via a proper communication technique by the compliance manager. The manufacturing technologies to be introduced in this company might range from the introduction of recyclable products, mechanization of the chimney and combustion tunnels, and an inclusion of a computerized system to manage the inflow and outflow of the plastic materials in the Company. The effect will see a complete compliance team that will reduce its labor force substantively through division and specialization of labor from the new technologies in the building (Bateman and Snell, 2013).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the manager of conformity takes actions of liaising with the emissions and control technologies Center (EERC) to make sure that there is fluency in agreement according to the acts and procedures used by the chemical company. The knowledge of clean air is taught to the compliance manager by the EERC such that the whole organization staff can share it. The EERC has the state of art technology that can be applied by the plastic manufacturer in that, the regulations and the utility of the products are attained simultaneously. The knowledge from the EERC is then simulated by the manager in the company to be used for the next generations processes.The mechanization and applied science are copied via a learning process by the officer of the lessons learned from the solid company.
The company will improve on the better procedures in eliminating the sulfur and nitrogen emissions in the atmosphere in Maryland. The compliance office will focus their energy and the productions and maximization of profits after the above criteria are followed in an attempt to evade fines and regulation from the global warming supplementary group. The company will, however, continue with its research for future risk mitigations in matters environmental health. The new technologies adopted by the officer will see a reduction of pollutants in the air that is toxic to the survival of humans in the area and good growths of the habitats ecosystem. A formation of partnerships is finalized between the government, the industries around and the global warming groups will change the commercialization and technological world to a better place for living and business transactions.
References
Bateman, Thomas S, and Snell, S (2013). M. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies Print.
Christina H., S, and Somers F., T (2004). Vice & Virtue in Everyday life: introductory readings in ethics. Wadsworth & Thompson
