“Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong, as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure.” Utilitarianism is to maximize happiness and reduce suffering; it is to maximize utility.
The core principle of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle. It promotes the ability to achieve happiness or higher pleasures for the most amounts of people. The significance of happiness has already been recognized, as all men agreed that happiness is the desire in the end. If a person desire something, it is possible to produce that anything is desirable. It is the quality of happiness rather than the quantity of pleasure, the core to utilitarianism. The qualities cannot be quantified and it seeks to uphold the ability to achieve higher pleasures. The good is defined in different matters by different point of views of utilitarianism. Whatever be the choice made by the utilitarian, it will choose an action that result in the most utility may be. What matters most is the consequence and not the intent. Start out with the best intentions, however, if the action caused harm immorality occurred.
The tyranny of the majority is the will of the people who are the majority that victimize the minority people. For example, during the discussion systems of democracy and majority rule, a criticism of the event as decision is made by the majority under its system placed the majority interests above the interest of the minority and compare in cruelty to tyrannical despots. However, if the power retained, it would be a protection against it; if the powers has been separated among legislature, executive, and judiciary, it would be a protection against the tyranny of the majority. The solution to the tyranny of majority is the proportional representation of the rich and well educated.
In addition, proportional representation is a solution to different problems and the limits on the decisions made by the majority such as the constitutional limits and use the bill of fights in a parliamentary democracy are meant to avoid the problem generally. Whether an action is morally right or wrong depends completely on its consequences. An action is right if it brings about the best result of the choices available. If not, it is wrong.
