Complete Name of Student
Scenario 1
Although unethical, the pressure of acquiring the maximum repayment for services lead to manipulating or falsifying documentation because the purpose is no longer focused on the services that is being provided to the patients but rather on repayment which is in contradiction to the standard of medical practices. In the scenario given, being a subordinate and for wanting to keep my job, I would have no choice but to follow the order that was given to me. It is most likely that I would “up-code” the billing by falsifying the existing documents. There are many other factors that can be considered but it is best to get back to the basic to remind all medical practitioners of the Hippoctratic Oath. It is the regulatory standard for health care moral values. It is one of the primogenital mandatory documents ever written. Its ideologies are revered by practitioners to this day. Treat the patient to the best of one's capability, maintain patient confidentiality, impart the secret and techniques of medical practices to the next generation and so on.
Scenario 2
Most errors are unreported by health care personnel. The usual culprit that prevents reporting is the emotional responses of the health care provider. They feel guilty, worried about the disciplinary repurcussion for themselves and worried about the outcome of the error that could either put the patient in danger or even cause his or her death. In some cases, nurses takes responsilibity and blame no one but themselves and in other instances, even practitioners replied to blunders with lack of confidence, and disgrace. As an alternative of carrying the agony of faux pas alone, the practitioners should actually acknowledge it because like anything else, it’s not a perfect science. Reporting one’s mistakes can be influenced by numerous things. For one, clinicians dread profession-endangering penalizing suits and probable dereliction lawsuit and accountability. Unreported mistakes from adverse results add to this anxiety, along with the legalization of deadly health care blunders. In most instances, damaging results lead to reporting mistakes only when a patient is damaged or the same could not possible be suppressed. At the same time, more health care workers are susceptible to legitimate legal suit when such error reports are submitted although it could have been successfully concealed with no possible consequence, (Wolf & Hughes, 2008).
Scenario 3
Intervention organizations can put the following in place to prevent discrimation:
Impact the actions of persons, comprising their drive and competency to sway others, instead of just focusing the effort in increasing information and mindfulness. If approaches to develop intergroup interactions do not contain programs on how to act accordingly when it comes to others, they are, in mose cases, futile in affecting interactions. Many people are not as knowledgeable as we ought to be in our dealings with people we identify to be ethnically diverse. Even good intentions sometimes result to different outcome. Bias and perception are communally subjective.
Handle the outlooks and conduct of all cultural and traditional clusters concerned. Race interactions platforms and events concentrate on responsiveness and information concerning, and manners toward, individuals of different colors. Where cultural and racial mixture occurs, it presents a chance for education and assessment that could aid prevent generalization or labeling, (Hawley, 1995).
References
Willis Hawley (1995). Strategies for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Prejudice: Essential
Principles for Program Design, Retrieved July 5, 2015, from Teaching Tolerance,
http://www.tolerance.org/supplement/strategies-reducing-racial-and-ethnic-prejudice-essential-pr
Zane Robinson Wolf; Ronda G. Hughes (2008, April). Patient Safety and Quality: An
Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, Chapter 35Error Reporting and Disclosure,
Retrieved July 5, 2015, from NCBI Bookshelf,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2652/
