In 2009, Dan Pink made a speech in which he discussed motivation, its concepts and its true reality. The most widespread motivational tool is money, sometimes not money itself, but a reward, in general. In his speech, Dan Pink argues that an approach like this is obsolete and ineffective.
An experiment was set up, in order to test people’s motivation to perform better and solve problems faster. Two groups of participants have been presented with a “Candle problem”. The task was to take a set of supplies and attach a candle to the wall and prevent the wax from dripping on the table. The problem requires creativity and out of the box thinking in order to be solved. The first group was to simply solve the problem; the second one was motivated with a monetary reward. Surprisingly, the second group did a lot worse.
Dan explains such an outcome as something that science knows and the business doesn’t see and is refusing to implement. He goes on to interpret, that the money-based reward system only works in case of simple, routine, operational tasks that have only one obvious solution and do not involve a lot of thinking. However, if the job requires any kind of critical thinking, creativity or problem solving skills, reward oriented motivation significantly worsens the performance.
Dan Pink believes, that once businesses are ready to see, what science already knows, it can be a revolution in todays world and the society we live in.
247 words
Good Essay About Surprising Science Of Motivation
Type of paper: Essay
Topic: Reward, Money, Motivation, Thinking, Pink, Science, Rhetoric, Community
Pages: 1
Words: 250
Published: 01/01/2021
Cite this page
- APA
- MLA
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Chicago
- ASA
- IEEE
- AMA
Note: this
sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance.
Finished papers: 363
This paper is created by writer with
ID 134077
If you want your paper to be:
Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate
Original, fresh, based on current data
Eloquently written and immaculately formatted
