Good Essay On Rhetorical Analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency is a body that works to ensure that the environment is clean and safe for the US citizens. From the article under analysis, the body is at a risk of losing its powers due to the political play that is at hand. Having being established by President Richard Nixon it carries a strong grass-root that cannot be ignored. With the rule of President Donald Trump, his new E.P.A administrator Scott Pruitt was in the frontline of fighting against the body.
It, therefore, becomes a danger zone for the body because a lot could change. The purpose was to make it clear that the E.P.A has a firm root which cannot just be removed or cut down by any person who takes the high desk. The environment is important to a majority of the citizens hence does not rely on specifics.
In addition to that, the use of a current event in the US gives a stronger grip to the article. Since the incident raised a lot of alarms in the US, every person would want to know more about it and the political play surrounding the situation. Alarming incidences create an interest which makes the people want to read more or gain more information. Once an accident has happened, there is always a lot of rumors surrounding it hence the need to go deeper and understand what is actually happening.
With the audience already captured through the first look of the paper without reading more, the author aimed at passing information to the people. The authors support the firm root that lies in the E.P.A, and the main aim is to bring to light what is happening to the organization about the political state. Having an interest in the body, the author brought in politics to show the extent of the risk at hand. Everyone loves to know what is happening in the political arena hence it becomes the best way to bring out information.
Environment versus politics is the claim that is at hand. The two terms bring out a lot of interest in the world today. The situation has been discussed and is still being reviewed daily due to global warming and climate change. Politics, on the other hand, is an everyday job due to the rule of the world and to make it worse, the recent elections in the US make politics a heated debate.
According to the authors claim, the political state in the US today is most likely to do away with the environmental policies and in depth do away with the E.P.A which holds environmental issues in the nation. From the claim, the author has provided evidence and has been able to persuade the readers to believe the information.
The use of recent data from the E.P.A that shows how much people value the environment is one way of convincing the readers. Statistics never lie, and it is the best way to prove individual claims. From the numbers, it is clear that more than seventy percent of the US population care about their environment and their health. From this, anyone in any nation can conclude and agree with the author that the E.P.A needs to be saved from the risk it might face.
Also, explanations of the environmental acts and laws that stand a risk of being removed help the audience understand what is in danger. Definition of environmental terms has been used to explain to the people what happens and how the body operates about the acts. The use of a little theory is a way of the author educating the people of environmental terms and also it is ways of helping the people understand what the laws do. At the same time, it a way of telling the people about the environmental legislation that exist and why they are important. Through this, the author ensures that the audience can relate with the information provided and also link it to the happenings in the environment.
Political evidence used by the author, for example, the nomination of the E.P.A administrator after the works of Scott Pruitt in the past persuades the readers of how politics moves around. Through this evidence, the author can convince the reader that Scott is not good enough for the position because he has no likes for the environment. His nomination was all political, and it did not lie in the professional ability required to manage such an organization.
Also, any individual who reads the article and wants to understand more has been given a starting point. The author has not provided information in depth, but the information is brief, important and also interesting for further research. Examples always provide the evidence strength. To add to the evidence and the use of examples, the author has also mentioned more recent accidents that people have not forgotten. With the last occasion, the reader can link the information and also research more.
The tone used by the author and the side of support is an indication that the writer is interested in the topic. Being a supporter of the topic, the writer has used simple, appropriate language to convince the audience to believe the work written down.