It is much easier to kill an organization than to change it from within. As surprisingly as it may sound, in case with giant corporations and the way they operate it is ultimately true. To successfully support their existence they form a structured and rigid framework upon which they are able to build and expand, but such framework does not permit drastic changes that may be required on an unstable market. It would also be quite challenging to make any significant changes to company’s organizational policy because although it is structured and well organized it is also very fragile because bureaucratic processes are far from being flexible and agile.
It is better to live a short life and make a big impact than vice versa. A company that is not stale and managed by people who take on risky endeavours is likely to make a difference on the market and change the rules for everyone. However, its lifespan is likely to be inversely proportional to the impact it makes. Basically, the company exists to drive change and once it has played its role, once the change has happened, it can be argued that the company loses its purpose and, therefore, has to leave the game. It doesn't mean, however, that all the resources, both material and human the company has accumulated have to go to waste. Instead, these people who possess immense experience and are backed up by the funds they have accumulated continue to drive change forming new start-ups.
Big companies are prone to incremental development, but under the unstable market conditions it becomes a disadvantage. Incremental progress suggests small and highly rational steps in the company’s development, however, when it comes to making significant leaps or impact, as discussed in the previous paragraph, big fish finds itself in a disadvantage because they are either not ready to make harsh decisions or simply to not have the needed flexibility to do so. Besides, incremental steps are not something an agile and innovation-driven companies would want to do because such strategy does not align with their goals.
Good Essay On Supplementary Assignment 1
Type of paper: Essay
Topic: Company, Development, Market, Driving, Infrastructure, People, Framework, Disadvantage
Pages: 2
Words: 350
Published: 02/20/2023
Cite this page
- APA
- MLA
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Chicago
- ASA
- IEEE
- AMA