Good Ethics In Public Policy And Administration 3 Essay Example

The article by John McKnight, titled ‘John Deere and the Bereavement Counselor’ goes on to talk of the traditional wisdom of mankind. The Europeans who came over to the native states had to adapt to the ways of living in the region and how they coped up with the ambiance is a matter of interest. They were new to the situation they were thriving in at this place and hence they had to come up with new device and ways to plough the land and sustain overcoming the impediments of the nature.
The subsequent invention of steel plow actually accelerated the process of depletion of the tillable land. The Europeans had actually become oblivious to the traditional methods of plowing the land as they found the new technique. The plow invented by John Deere was thus a very huge disaster in retrospect.
Quite like this, the bereavement counselor would once emerge as the decisive factor in the impediments which the people of the community would face. The services of the counselor would lead to the alienation of the other members of the community as they would feel that the person who is bereaved of a near one has the support and guidance of the counselor.
Thus, one should take into consideration the factor of counter-productivity. As such, the abolition of these techniques is the best possible thing to do as they hardly serve the actual need for which they had seen the inception.
Hence, the services should be weighed against the possible shortcomings and adverse effects which might arise with time. It has to be comprehended if the usage of these services is fetching anything good in the long run. The implementation has to be far-sighted and should aim at the greater gain ignoring the possible immediate return which might seem productive from the surface.
In the chapter, ‘Administrative Responsibility: The Key to Administrative Ethics’ by Terry Cooper, the author describes the paramount importance of responsibility which entails administration. Objective and subjective responsibilities come with the onus of having the power to administer over matters.
Objective responsibility brings in two domains: accountability and obligation. Objective responsibility to the people who have elected the administrator has to be in compliance with law. Superiors and subordinates in an organization also have responsibilities which they need to carry out. Those at the top are responsible for the subordinates’ work. The third form of responsibility is actually the obligation to serve the public interest. The work of the public administrators is gauged by their conduct in the terms of the interest of the masses.
On the other hand, subjective responsibility comes from the value system of individuals. Such responsibility is not bound by organizational or legal regulations or expectations. Rather, it has its root in the nature of the person who is feeling the onus of responsibility on his or her shoulders. Thus, subjective responsibility can be described as something which grows out of socializing and the other roles played by the individuals.
The internal sources of responsibility and the external demands are related to each other by the ethical process. Fulfilling one’s responsibility is a huge thing in the workplace and the individual needs to balance among the conflicts on responsibilities being caught up in the multiplicity of roles. The management of the administrative role is thus a tough task to accomplish.