Good Ethics Name Essay Example

Follett and Cooper consider what comes out as a difficult function in modern day management. This is management of public order and discipline among a diverse group of people in a public environment. The overriding factor that often informs administrative ideology is the fact that, public as opposed to private, belongs to everyone and no one in particular. For that reason, the public order and discipline could be difficult to implement given the contradicting opinions that often comes about.
Cooper talks about the external and internal controls. According to Cooper, it is essential for the administrator to attain a level of control. Reigning control over the employees could pursue either internal or external controls. The internal controls are within the organizational structure while the external controls relate to the reactionary measures from the pressure exerted to the organization by the public. It is the postulation of this paper that control is necessary. The public administrator should be able to contain the employees. This is in addition to the ability to solve the conflicts in the organization. It is essential for the public administrator to provide a sense of leadership and unity. Notwithstanding the method one settles on for the solution of the organizational conflicts, it is incumbent on the administrator to demonstrate a sense of leadership.
Follett provides a solution that may prove useful in the achievement of this objective. According to Follett, it would be useful that the administrator pursues an interactionism method. According to the theory of interactionism, the public administrator needs to concentrate on the human aspects of the employees. The administrator needs to establish a channel of communication and ensure the workers are in direct and effective communication. In addition to this, it is necessary that conflicts are solved constructively. Constructive solution of conflicts necessitates the use of dialogue and communication. Each party needs to be given an opportunity to air their grievances. A fair administrator must pay attention to the issues from either side and address the same effectively. This is one method through which order and ethical conduct in the organization may be attained.
The other question fundamentally raised by the authors relate to ethical conduct. Due to the competing interests, administrators may be tempted to look the other side and overlook ethical conduct. The effect of such a trajectory is two-fold. First, the administrator loses the focus in the management of public affairs and secondly, the administrator loses the moral compass to reign in on the unethical employees. It is, therefore, necessary that public administrators approach ethical conduct with a cautious mindset that acts with the benefit of hindsight. This is necessary for the overall maintenance of public order and promotion of responsible conduct in the organization.
In conclusion, it is necessary for public administrators to have a wide knowledge of the issues of management. Decision making and resolution of conflicts must be pursued from an informed point of view. This is ideally because making decisions that are out of touch would not augur well for the administrator. Further, it is essential to make use of the internal and external controls expounded by Cooper. This is because the controls enable the maintenance of public order and disciplined conduct. The gist of public management lies in the standards the administrator sets for himself. Once the administrator fumbles, he risks losing control and hence the onset of anarchy in the organization.