Introduction and Review
Background
This paper will focus on a systematic review to determine the barriers of implementing TQM approach in health care organizations. Today, there is a need for realizing the TQM concept, essential in indicating the function of organizations, by trying to better put in use resources, and knowledge through individuals sharing and working together in teams. This is by identifying the obstacles hence, helps in the uncovering of management's beliefs, important in developing awareness of duties in daily management, which are regarded as “true”. TQM is a philosophy that proposes uniform obligation to quality, in all organizational areas towards promoting an organizational culture that tends to meet the quality perception of consumers’. This is of great need in ensuring the effectiveness of the Organizations on Health Care. The TQM concept largely rests on five basic principles, which look into an individual or even team, ensuring the: Production of first time quality work, customer focus, strategic improvement approach, the improved continuance and encouragement of teamwork and mutual respect (Yasin, 1998, p. 9).
Demonstration of the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency is a feature of good governance. Improving TQM at all levels yields the quality efficiency. Therefore, there is need to support it at the Health Care organizations. In European countries, Hospitals apply broad range strategies of quality improvement. This is with effectiveness knowledge of these strategies, implemented as part of a largely l quality improvement in the hospital system, gets to be limited.
TQM increases customer satisfaction, and further lowers costs. Health Care organizations, should therefore implement TQM through encouraging employees and managers to team up across functions and units, so as to identify areas that require improvements, irrespective of their irrelevance. This enables the worker teams to be trained and be empowered in decisions making, hence helping organizations to achieve high quality standards. With organizations shifting responsibility departmentally, employees achieve specialized quality control, a shift to the decentralized approach from the perceived bureaucratic control (Tamburis, 2008, p. 3).
Therefore, there is a need for an effective TQM program. This has to contain numerous benefits. In the case of financial benefits for Health care organizations, there should be lower costs, and investment, with the higher ability to charge relatively to competitive prices. Other benefits should include improved access to global health care, higher customer maintenance levels, and a quality built reputation firm. To note on this, only less organizations use TQM to implement effective programs. It is perceived to be consuming much effort, time, funds and patience. This might not be the case, because, firms with the essential resources might gain competitive recompense in implementing TQM (Jaafaripooyan, 2011, p. 17).
Methods
A systematic search of PubMed database was conducted using the keywords of accreditation, medical practice, hospital, and health care. This assisted in the, quantifying and analysis. Health care conduit level, constructs the assessed possibilities that got to include hospital governance, a system of quality improvement, external pressure, organizational culture, patient empowerment, and professional involvement. In addition, searches for other published literature were undertaken using the website. This strategy resulted to several articles in English that considered exclusion and inclusion of various criteria. Use of a questionnaire, which is web-based, to survey hospitals acute care in eight EU countries was applicable. This also incorporates a Systematic review, which is an indication of methodical review and Assessment on Health Technology reports in databases.
All papers were reviewed and themes or attributes identified in the listed papers. Every program deemed on the selected attributes. Further, the use of multi-level analysis that in-depth of health care policies quality and practices got relevance. This assessed hospitals five dimensions health systems: content, technology, accessibility, marketing, and usability. This also calculated an overall ranking to identify the top health system hospitals and websites (General, 1992, p. 45).
Another form was on patient safety mechanisms and structures in acute care hospitals. On-site audit carried out independently by surveyors assessed outputs on patient safety. Thereafter, presenting a bivariate and univariate statistics on exploration, and implementation the associations amid of patient safety implementation strategies and the hospital.
Findings
Major results of this study were summarized using one criterion, the extraction table in Appendix. In deducting inferences, a number of barriers tend to be behind the implementation of TQM in HCOs. All attributes were met while keeping with the standards of citation in the JACHO program. Notably, this program is one of the strongest views on design and quality of standards. TQM efforts that are unsuccessful in healthcare organizations are attributed to rigid bureaucratic, hierarchical and departmentalized structure, which is full of professional tensions and autonomy, amid the management and other related professionals. This makes it difficult to ensure evaluation involvement in healthcare processes. However, other obstacles include consistent managers' and commitment of employees' lack in the involvement implementing TQM. Poor leadership of the management and quality driven culture lack, inadequate resources and training also are barriers (Venkatraman, 2007, p. 16).
In Europe, a barrier compromising TQM, is Potassium chloride total variance substantial amount. This observation brought hospital differences, an important component in the same country when looking into PSS of 65.9%. However, it is a perception that; the manager, in the case of Health care organization is a methodical and reflective planner. As a way to shun this, the management should be swamped by crises and trivialities with little time on an activity. Extensively, a perception that needs science rises. The reality contrasts by placing managers to be relying on the interaction with employees for judgment. As a barrier, it is perceived that, Managers get to be self-directed, self-starters, and autonomous. However, this is not the case. Excellent managers get to be self-managing as they seek supervisor's input and accept autonomy. Further, it gets to be a misconception that becomes a barrier that managers’ competition is good. But the truth is, TQM advocates for collaboration and cooperation to develop.
Discussion
TQM is a broader concept that goes beyond quality controlling. It is the effort coordination directed at improving and satisfaction customers, to reduce the service barriers by increasing participation of employees, supplier partnerships strengthening, and organizational atmosphere facilitation for continuous improvement of quality. It becomes a way of thinking in an organization and how working with them people should relevant. TQM is not simply a technique, but an anchored philosophy in the long-term belief of success, depending on commitments that are uniform in quality in organizational sectors.
The quality commitment requires the transforming of the entire health care organization. Being based on a scheme that express an organization's action, considerations must be taken, that are not limited in order to attain TQM. This should be by creating loyalty of purpose for development of artifacts and service. To achieve this, a new radical definition of health sector roles should be provided. This should be through constant improvement of research, innovation, and maintenance (Plice, 1992, p. 45).
New philosophy adoption gets to be essential. Based on the new economic age, organizations need to revolutionize into “learning organizations.” In addition, there is a need for an innovative belief whereby negativism and mistakes are unacceptable.
`TQM advocates for the Cease on dependence on accumulative inspection. Through Elimination, the mass inspection need, by quality built into the product, gets to be achieved. This should be integral of the end price awarding on organizations. Instead, this should aim at total cost minimization, to enable a move towards single health care supplies (Neuroth, 1992, p. 89).
An emphasis on TQM sees is an improvement, in the production system and service delivery constantly. Health care improvement does not get to be a one-time effort. Management in an organization gets to continually be obligated to look for ways, in which to reduce wastages and improve on quality. This has been a success through the Institute trainings, which frequently, workers get to learn from other workers. This is in line with Institute leadership, which brings in line leading that consists of serving people to enable the doing of a better job as they learn through objective methods. Over time, this has been seen to drive out employees fear.
This is because, most employees get afraid to take positions a case evident even as they do not understand what is right at their job place or wrong. This translates into economic losses that are horrendous. To guarantee better quality and output, it is essential that workers feel secure, though a workable TQM (Lefebvre, 2011, p. 8).
Basing on the Health Care organizations, lots of barriers do exist between the functional units. Through the departments break down barriers, often, organizational units tend to compete with each other, with goals that tend to conflict. Team work gets to be a failed tactic; with a difficulty in solving of problems. This at its peak calls for adoption of TQM.
TQM has seen the elimination of slogans, arithmetical targets, and exhortations set by the executives at the workforce. This for a very long time never helped anybody, in the doing of a good job. A proposal outlined, recommends that workers should formulate slogans that suit them; to ensure that they get a commitment to contents that they engage in. This form of elimination goes in line with the elimination of arithmetical quotas, or what used to be termed as work standards. The case of quotas, it considers only numbers, but not methods or quality. Usually, these guarantees high inefficiency and cost.
The TQM has therefore been seen to be enabling the removal of barriers that tend to prevent workers from enchanting their workmanship pride. A case of misguided supervisors, defective materials and faulty equipments, hinder good performance, in Health Care Organizations. These barriers need to be removed, by Instituting of vigorous educational programs. This should see both the workforce and the management informational consent of new techniques and knowledge. This will ensure the transformational action, requiring a plan of action of the top management team in the carrying out the quality mission (Johnson, 2009, p. 7).
Conclusion
In the Health Care organization, surveying customers, and the consulting, production-line workers, gets to be critical. With substantial gaps amid evidence and exercising of PSS in hospitals based in Europe, that have variations resulting from country differences, agencies supporting PSS implementation should closely re-examine the current strategies effectiveness.
This helps the solving of quality related problems, and facilitates teamwork, in task performance. This enables organizations to learn and understand the need to collect data in the organization, for the purpose of statistical monitoring as a means of surveillance and measuring of the satisfaction of customers. This is with the goals of producing the quantity and quality goods and services, which are affordable to consumers (Sebastianelli, 1998, p. 21).
Recommendations
In pursuit of efficiency in Health Care Organizations, TQM should begin at the top level of an organization to the employees who are off hourly line. It should also get the support of all firm levels to ensure the realization of real quality improvements, by outweighing the perceived myths on management and work. In addition, through commitment from the organizations top most levels; requirements should be met to ensure the success of TQM. This should be through:
A corporate culture change, which focuses on quality, importance and quality achieving through the forging of internal team partnerships, further improvements of processes and project, external partnership creation with suppliers and customers, quality assurance technique through audits with no limit to obstacle removal in implementations for successful TQM. This may include the addressing of short run logistical that entail time or money. Through studies, a period of two- ten years are desirable, to obtain the remuneration of a successful program on TQM.
Reference
Change Process in Organizations [in HRD]. (1995).
General Accounting Office, W. v. (1992). Quality Management. Survey of Federal Organizations. Briefing Report to the Honorable Donald Ritter, House of Representatives.
Halladay, M., & Bero, L. (2000). Getting research into practice: implementing evidence-based practice in health care. Public Money and Management, 20(4), 43-50.
Hoffman, A. M., & Julius, D. J. (1995). Total Quality Management: Implications for Higher Education.
Jaafaripooyan, E. (2011). Contextual approach to the performance analysis of Iran’s national accreditation programme for healthcare organisations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
Johnson, J. A. (2009). Organization Development and the Future. Health Organizations: Theory, Behavior, and Development, 395.
Lefebvre, É., Castro, L., & Lefebvre, L. A. (2011). Assessing the prevailing implementation issues of RFID in healthcare: A five-phase implementation model. Int. J. Electron. Comput. Comm. Tech, 5(2), 110-117.
Neuroth, J., Canadian Day Care Advocacy Association, O. )., & And, O. (1992). Total Quality Management Handbook: Applying the Baldrige Criteria to Schools.
Plice, S. J. (1992). Changing the Culture: Implementing TQM in an IT Organization. Cause/Effect, 15(2), 20-25.
Sebastianelli, R., & Tamini, N. (1998). Barriers to TQM: A Class-Level Student Project. Journal Of Education For Business, 73(3), 158-62.
Tamburis, O. (2008). Analysis and selection of management technologies in the healthcare organisations: the Balanced Scorecard approach in the image diagnostics service. International Journal of Environment and Health, 2(2), 131-146.
Venkatraman, S. (2007). A Framework for Implementing TQM in Higher Education Programs. Quality Assurance In Education: An International Perspective, 15(1), 92-112.
Yasin, M. M., Meacham, K. A., & Alavi, J. (1998). The status of TQM in healthcare. Health Marketing Quarterly, 15(3), 61-84.
