Apple VS. Orange
This is a comparison between an apple and an orange as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 11 flies have come to the apple side. At t=5 min, 11 more flies came to the apple side. At time t=10min, 12 more flies came to the apple side.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 3 flies came to the orange side. At time t=5min, 3 more flies came to Orange side. At time t=10 min, a single fly joined the cohort of the flies towards the Orange side.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 2 flies came to the middle position between the Apple and Orange side. At time t=5min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the Apple and Orange side. At time t=10min, 3 flies came to the middle position between the Apple and Orange side.
Total flies in Apple side in 10 minutes: 11+11+12=34 flies
Total flies in Orange side in 10 minutes: 3+3+1=10 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(12+1)*3]/2=19.5
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=15.408 to be rejected.
This means that Apple has a more pronounced effect on the behavior of flies as compared to Orange.
Apple VS. 0.8 Sugar Water
This is a comparison between an apple and 0.8 Sugar Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 5 flies have come to the apple side. At t=5 min, 3 more flies have joined the cohort of the Apple side flies. At time t=10min, 4 more flies have joined the cohort of the Apple side flies. At t=15 min, 3 more flies have joined the cohort of the Apple side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 3 flies came to the 0.8 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 9 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 7 more flies joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar Water side flies. At t=15min, 10 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the Apple and 0.8 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the Apple and 0.8 Sugar Water side. At time t=10min, 3 flies came to the middle position between the Apple and 0.8 Sugar Water side. At time t=15min, 1 more fly came in the middle position of Apple side and 0.8 sugar water side.
Total flies in Apple side in 15 minutes: 5+3+4+3=15 flies
Total flies in 0.8 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 9+9+7+10=35 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(3+10)*4]/2=28
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=7.785 to be rejected.
This means that Apple has more pronounced effect on the behavior of flies as compared to 0.8 Sugar Water.
Banana VS. Tomato
This is a comparison between a banana and tomato as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 4 flies have come to the banana side. At t=5 min, 4 more flies have joined the cohort of the banana side flies. At time t=10min, 5 more flies have joined the cohort of the banana side flies. At t=15 min, 1 more fly joined the cohort of the banana side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 8 flies came to the tomato side. At time t=5min, 8 more flies have joined the cohort of the tomato side flies. At time t=10 min, 9 more flies joined the cohort of the tomato side flies. At t=15min, 14 more flies have joined the cohort of the tomato side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 2 flies came to the middle position between the banana and tomato side. At time t=5min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the banana and tomato side. At time t=10min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the banana and tomato side. At t=15min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the banana and tomato side
Total flies in Banana side in 15 minutes: 4+4+5+1=14 flies
Total flies in Tomato side in 15 minutes: 8+8+9+14=39 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(14+1)*4]/2=30
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=11.23 to be rejected.
This means that Banana has a more pronounced effect on the behavior of flies as compared to Tomato.
Tomato VS. Apple
This is a comparison between a tomato and an apple as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 10 flies have come to the tomato side. At t=5 min, 9 more flies have joined the cohort of the tomato side flies. At time t=10min, 9 more flies have joined the cohort of the tomato side flies. At t=15 min, 8 more flies have joined the cohort of the tomato side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 0 flies came to the apple side. At time t=5min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the apple side flies. At time t=10 min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the apple side flies. At t=15min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the apple side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the tomato and apple side. At time t=5min, 0 more flies came to the middle position between the tomato and apple side. At time t=10min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the tomato and apple side. At t=15min, 1 fly came to the middle position between the tomato and apple side.
Total flies in Tomato side in 15 minutes: 10+9+9+8=36 flies
Total flies in Apple side in 15 minutes: 0+1+1+1=3 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(8+1)*4]/2=18
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=30.5 to be rejected.
This means that Tomato has a more pronounced effect on the behavior of flies as compared to Apple.
0.8 Sugar Water VS. Water
This is a comparison between 0.8 Sugar water and Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 8 flies have come to the 0.8 Sugar water side. At t=5 min, 8 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At time t=10min, 7 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At t=15 min, 8 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 0 flies came to the Water side. At time t=5min, 0 more flies have joined the cohort of the Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 2 more flies has joined the cohort of the Water side flies. At t=15min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 1 fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and Water side. At time t=5min, 1 more fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and Water side. At time t=10min, 0 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and Water side. At t=15min, 0 more fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and Water side.
Total flies in Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 8+8+7+8=31 flies.
Total flies in Water side in 15 minutes: 0+0+2+1=3 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(8+1)*4]/2=18
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=21.89 to be rejected.
This means that Water has a more pronounced effect than sugar water.
0.8 Sugar Water VS. 0.6 Sugar Water
This is a comparison between 0.8 Sugar water and 0.6 Sugar Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 7 flies have come to the 0.8 Sugar water side. At t=5 min, 4 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At time t=10min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At t=15 min, 3 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 5 flies came to the 0.6 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 8 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.6 Sugar Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 10 more flies has joined the cohort of the 0.6 Sugar Water side flies. At t=15min, 7 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.6 Sugar Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 1 fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.6 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 1 more fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.6 Sugar Water side. At time t=10min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.6 Sugar Water side. At t=15min, 3 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.6 Sugar Water side.
Total flies in 0.8 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 7+4+1+3=15 flies
Total flies in 0.6 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 5+8+10+7=30 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(7+3)*4]/2=20
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=6.25 to be rejected.
This means that 0.6 Sugar water has a more pronounced effect than 0.8 Sugar water.
0.8 Sugar Water VS. 1.0 Sugar Water
This is a comparison between 0.8 Sugar water and 1.0 Sugar Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 1 fly has come to the 0.8 Sugar water side. At t=5 min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At time t=10min, 0 more fly have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At t=15 min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 12 flies came to the 1.0 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 11 more flies have joined the cohort of the 1.0 Sugar Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 10 more flies has joined the cohort of the 1.0 Sugar Water side flies. At t=15min, 9 more flies have joined the cohort of the 1.0 Sugar Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 0 flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 1.0 Sugar Water side. At time t=5min, 1 more fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 1.0 Sugar Water side. At time t=10min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 1.0 Sugar Water side. At t=15min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 1.0 Sugar Water side.
Total flies in 0.8 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 1+1+0+1=3 flies
Total flies in 1.0 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 12+11+10+9=42 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(9+1)*4]/2=20
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=42.65 to be rejected.
This means that 1.0 Sugar water has a more pronounced effect than 0.8 Sugar water.
0.8 Sugar Water VS. 0.8 Salt Water
This is a comparison between 0.8 Sugar water and 0.8 Salt Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 3 flies have come to the 0.8 Sugar water side. At t=5 min, 3 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At time t=10min, 5 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies. At t=15 min, 6 more flies has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Sugar water side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 2 flies came to the 0.8 Salt Water side. At time t=5min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 10.8 Salt Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 2 more flies has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Salt Water side flies. At t=15min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 0.8 Salt Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 5 flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.8 Salt Water side. At time t=5min, 6 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.8 Salt Water side. At time t=10min, 3 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.8 Salt Water side. At t=15min, 3 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 Sugar water and 0.8 Salt Water side.
Total flies in 0.8 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 3+3+5+6=17 flies
Total flies in 0.8 Salt Water side in 15 minutes: 2+1+2+1=6 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(6+1)*4]/2=14
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=5.21 to be rejected.
This means that Salt water has a more pronounced effect on the behavior of the flies.
0.8 Salt Water VS. Water
This is a comparison between 0.8 Salt water and Water as to study their effect on the behavior of flies.
Here we observe that that at time=0min, 4 flies have come to the 0.8 salt water side. At t=5 min, 1 more fly has joined the cohort of the 0.8 salt water side flies. At time t=10min, 5 more flies have joined the cohort of the 0.8 salt water side flies. At t=15 min, 3 more flies has joined the cohort of the 0.8 salt water side flies.
Simultaneously, we observe that at time t=0min, 5 flies came to the Water side. At time t=5min, 2 more flies have joined the cohort of the Water side flies. At time t=10 min, 3 more flies has joined the cohort of the Water side flies. At t=15min, 4 more flies have joined the cohort of the Water side flies.
Apart from this, it was also observed that at time t=0min, 1 fly came to the middle position between the 0.8 salt water and Water side. At time t=5min, 7 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 salt water and Water side. At time t=10min, 2 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 salt water and Water side. At t=15min, 3 more flies came to the middle position between the 0.8 salt water and Water side.
Total flies in 0.8 Sugar Water side in 15 minutes: 4+1+5+3=13 flies
Total flies in Water side in 15 minutes: 5+2+3+4=14 flies
The total degree of n of flies = [(3+4)*4]/2=14
As the conditions on both the sides are not the same, and the range of acceptance lies between 2.71<χ2<3.84, therefore we can assume the χ2 value=0.071 to be rejected.
This means that Sugar Water Side cannot affect the behavior of the flies while 0.8 Sugar water has a negligible effect.
