Good Example Of Can Moral Value Be Aggregated? Essay

In a utilitarian’s perspective, questions about ends are concerned with the identification of things that are desirable. For example, the utilitarian doctrine postulates that happiness is desirable. But it has been argued that questions regarding ultimate ends do not admit of proof. All first principles are incapable of proof on account of reasoning alone not only to the first premises of our knowledge but also to our conduct. But since our conduct has more to do with factual matters which appeal to our internal consciousness as well as our senses which are faculties we usually use to judge facts. Kantian Deontology posits that an action from duty derives its moral worth from the maximum from which it is to be determined. Duty is a necessity which is acting due to one’s respect for the law. An action was done and whose basis is duty has to exclude the influence of inclination so that the only thing remaining and which determine a will is a law and subjectively pure respect for the law and consequently the maxim which dictate which law need to be followed.
A good will is a good by the will and nothing else. The ultimate end of moral values, just like a good will, are the motives which are regarded desirable. Moral values is a conduct issue and factual matters that require the application of consciousness as well as our senses. It, therefore, makes sense to aggregate moral values provided that the end or the ultimate desire is that which brings happiness. Happiness is an end of our conduct and is, therefore, a criterion for judging moral values. If happiness is unique to each person and that general happiness good to an aggregate of people, then it makes sense to aggregate moral values.