Good Example Of Fairness Of Obtaining A Government Contractnameinstitution Essay

The process of obtaining a government contract is to a larger extent fair though there are some cases where fairness is compromised. The federal government has had a policy that gives companies and other bidders the right to challenge the decisions made by the government concerning issuance of contracts if they think proper procedures are violated. The policy that was adopted in the 1920s played a major role in ensuring there is transparency in the manner the government does its activities. Furthermore, the system promotes efficiency and production of goods and services of higher quality, thus benefitting the local citizens since the bid winners know if they fail to meet the standards set they will not get subsequent contracts. Some bidders when they lose in the competition of being awarded a contract frustrate the entire process by finding some small aspects that the contract successful firms or individuals lack. They, in turn, use the loopholes to protest against the government and the companies awarded the contract and in some cases, they may cause the respective projects to come to a stop. The behavior is promoted by the lack of proper ethical standards by the participating individuals and firms. For example, in the case of Kayak town that had acquired a parcel of land, together with the premises on the land, there were a lot of frustrations in deciding the best person or firm to issue the contract. The firm that had been initially awarded the contract after the concerned authorities had conducted its investigation was later denied the opportunity after some team of bidders who had failed protested (Kozlowski, 2015). It is thus evident that ethical pitfalls occasionally affect the process of awarding government contracts negatively.
ReferenceKozlowski J.C (2015). "Competitive Bidding Fairness In Concession Contract | Law Review | Parks & Recreation Magazine". Parksandrecreation.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 14 Jan. 2016.