Part 1
1.True
2.True.
3.True
4 True
5 False.
6. False
7. True.
8. True
9. False
10. True.
11. True
12. True
13. True
14. True
15. True
Part 2
This was a value which was sourced from Jesus teaching. Soul Force was used to transform and bring peace to Indian people movement society by Gandhi. Today, it is used to change lives of women, men, and children who stay in violent households.
The argument of soul force claims that ends and means are inseparable and close. Gandhi rejected the idea that injustice should not be tolerated by all means. Violent, unjust means coercive are all confined to injustice. The principle of soul force is that it seeks to eradicate resentments without harming the antagonists themselves. Gandhi projected rules for soul force principle to follow in a confrontation movement including to never retaliate to assaults, harbor no annoyance, hurt the anger of the adversary, or sentence. One should not accept, out of fear of crime or punishment, to an instruction given in fury, willingly submit to seizure or confiscation of your property and if you are a trustee of goods, defend that property from confiscation with your life
Mills greatest principle, the principle of utility
The principle of utility is grounded on the Greatest Pleasure Norm, which claims that individuals actions reflect ethical considerations when they endorse competence and the wicked encourage the contrary. Mill defined utility principle as pleasure or happiness without pain. People are termed ethical and moral when their actions tend to promote the efficiency of the general public by the principle of utility.
These principles of utility issues are the incapability to overlook the future events and faultlessly regulate the significances of any act, the permitting of defying of societal laws and its disrespect of the object.
The principle of utility has many gaps as any moral systems. Due to our incapability to properly forecast the future rendering to people movements, the outcomes people desire fall short of what was intended. If this could happen to all individuals living in this world, then no person could be viewed as ethical and moral.
This principle also allows for people to cause hurt to others people as far as a majority of the individuals are happy and satisfied. This then could make murderers justify their murderous action by eliminating all their opponents. If their numbers are the majority, assassination becomes defensible as a moral action.
Lastly, this principle removes the use of the regulations and rules provided by people’s government. Since people's actions upsurge majority usefulness, this law claims that then laws being broken in the process do not matter. This principle fails in that the norm of what is or isn't ethical is easily altered in civilization's, and since most people benefit, then all current rules and individuals favorites would be deliberated, considered as unacceptable and can legitimize actions that people believe to be immoral and unethical.
What Mills means by happiness
Mill showed that explicitly characterizes happiness in eudemonic terms. Mill’s difference between advanced and lower preferences is most intelligible if he is classified as a eudaemonist. Mill’s prominence on the liberty of view and freedom of independence of existence in on Right is most understandable was classified as eudaemonist.
Mill states that desire is the only inherent sound, a hedonistic declaration if there ever were one. Mill points out that “happiness refers to all types of pleasure, whether physical, emotional, intellectual, aesthetic or otherwise.
Reading Mill as a eudaemonist instead of a hedonist aids to reinforce some of Mill’s other statements and opinions concerning the nature of contentment. This occurs particularly when eudaimonic used self-indulgent language to describe joy. The degenerate then usually drives to unlimited lengths to deliver complicated and highly hypothetical influences to the effect that things are merely valued instrumentally.
The mill has the option to these devices, but they still are not able to do away with the power of the terrible and extensively held the perception that there is something fundamentally valuable about the worth of itself, over and above any net gain of happiness it may give us. Mill accounts that beginning of happiness is eudaimonic and not hedonistic.
5. Importance of love by Mo Tzu
Mo Tzu strained to substitute what he believed being the extended engrained over-attachment of Chinese to domestic and societal organizations with the idea of general love
Mo Tzu argues about booming out universal love; Mo Tzu argued that the finest method of being devoted to your parents or guardian is obedient to other people parents. The basic norm is that malevolence and kindness, are requited and that individual is preserved by others people as one interacts with others entities. In chasing this line of the agreement, Mo Tzu was directly attracted to the ideas of progressive self-interest in communal relationships.
Also, Mo Tzu argued that benevolence comes to human beings as long as those individuals in power show kindness in their lives and lives of others. In distinguishing among the universal ideas and "difference," Mo Tzu said that common comes from justice while "difference" involves hominoid power.
Mo Tzu’s argued that universal love is extremely applied, and he argument concentrated in contradiction of those who protested that such kind of love might not be accomplished.
Mo Tzu also believed in the supremacy of spirits, though he is assumed to have adored them practically. Furthermore, for Mo Tzu the Heaven will be that all persons should love each other. Thus, he writes that the path to heaven is Universal love, since "Heaven nurtures and withstands all life deprived of regard to location." Mo Tzu's model of administration, which promoted a meritocracy grounded on ability instead of circumstance, moreover followed and trailed his Heaven idea.
9. Kant's view on women and his reasoning
Kant believes that the “cause” of autonomy, rationality, is present in European grown-up men. Since they are deprived of freedom or rationality, women are not within the moral kingdom. Subsequently, they are beyond the moral field, typical agents have no moral obligations to women.
Conversely, females have no ethical responsibilities to others, as requirements for a social being are characterized regarding one’s capacity for freedom, regarding one’s humanity and personality. Indeed, though he denies rationality to women, he also denies it to most males.
Kant upheld that, finally, reason would spread to a peak point. One sees that, if he saw the achievements of females in art, thinking, and the science, Kant would perhaps amend his political philosophy, and he could explain this amendment using the progress of reason.
If reason began with a few men in the Enlightenment, possibly with the help of the improvement of nature, it might arise to open rest. Though his denial of women’s rationality is indefensible currently, it is probable that Kant had tremendously inadequate knowledge with both females and people of other than European lineage during his lifetime. As with all prejudgments, it is cool to terminate another when one has no information about her. I say none of this to guard Kant’s prejudice; it can’t be protected. Though, he also cannot be judged in the court of contemporary understanding of race and gender.
Part3
1. Rousseau views on effects of society on humanity for better and worse
Rousseau's informative suggestion is highly simulated. This process is prudently timed and measured, but with the end of letting the free growth of human perspective.Similarly, his aim is liberty and does not combine a departure primitivism. It's perfect suggestion of the separate to what he termed the overall will.
The overall will is what ordinary people choose for their mutual interest. Liberty is compliant with a self-imposed rule of reason, self-imposed since compulsory by the natural laws of humankind.
The drive of civil legislation and management is to bring about an accident of the overall will and the desires of the public. The public gives the management its dominion when it forms the social contract to attain autonomy and well-being as a group.
His administrative attitude assumes that there is a general will and common good, which are not just perfect. The general will and common good can be under the right circumstances, be real. And in such conditions, Rousseau realizes our full growth taking place when "the rewards of a state of Mother Nature would be joined with the benefits of social life
His subtle responsiveness detained the subtle effects of the trees, animals, landscape, water, and other features of nature on the unstable state of the moral feeling. Rousseau is the predecessor of Idealistic awareness; the trend which existed before he was born, though he is a source of this theory.
