Good Example Of On Racist Speech Summary Essay

The article, “The debates over placing limits on racist speech must not ignore the damage it does to its victims”, by Charles Lawrence authored in 1989 justifies the impact of limits on racist speeches on the freedom and liberties of the people in the society. In particular, the author argues that regulations and limits on speeches led to the increase in racisms and discrimination against the minorities in the society. In addition, the author claims that racial harassment imposed on the speeches of the students limited the levels of participation of the minority students in politics. Furthermore, the article describes how the perceived strategies used to curb racism ended up creating a mixed-up racial atmosphere. The author insists on exercising due care in regulating the perceived racist speeches in the multiracial communities.
In addition, the author recommends that the universities should ensure that victims of racism receive equal education chances in institutions of higher learning. In addition, the legal arm of government should ensure that before debating the first amendment it needs understanding otherwise it could end up being a tool cause dominance for the superior rather than giving liberty to the victims of racism.
According to the writer, the victims of racism who are mostly the blacks say that they prefer the speeches that injure them most be unregulated because in such a market their best side will be heard and accepted because through experience they have learned that those elected into power do not want to be associated with them.
Furthermore, the implication of tolerating the racist speech in the name of maintaining tolerance in the society will mean the blacks and other affected persons must carry the cross for the good of everyone. Therefore, opposing any regulations by the government on speech will mean steps that promote equality of all people will finally take root. This will call for the society to look for methods to help those students who are by their speech and politically have been cold by the environment of racism. Civil lawyers should advocate for the educational right for those who are being discriminated in learning institutions based on their race.
In conclusion, the article demonstrated that the partial regulation of speeches leads to racism and victimization of the minorities in America. He contended that the hate mongers abuses the loopholes in the laws thereby oppressing the blacks and other minority groups in America. Moreover, the article discourages the racist ideas to protect the welfare of the oppressed people in America by promoting a non-discriminatory job and education environment.