Good Example Of PERT And Gantt: Which Is Your Preferred Style And Why? Essay

When it comes to visualization in term of scheduling tasks and organizing resources, I prefer GANTT charts. The way of presenting information is convenient, as the format of a bar chart is vivid and clear. Visualization helps managers to analyse projects. GANTT illustrates the percentage of completed work with regard to each task. Not only the level of completion of each task is shown, but also the interlinking tasks. Time allocation is another piece of data that is demonstrated in GANTT charts. However, I do not consider this to be the limitation.
A key reason why I prefer GANTT charts is that they are simple for straightforward interpretation of data. The display of interdependence of tasks is rather clear. The timeframe for completing each activity helps a project manager to determine who will perform each of the tasks. Afterwards, a project manager schedules a task depending on the total time allotted for the project. A bar graph is used to represent activities in the vertical axis, whereas the horizontal axis represents time. Each bar on the chart shows a single task as part of the project.
The obvious advantage of a GANTT chart is its graphical representation. Timelines and stages of completion clearly identify the priorities of the project. Since problems are often a number of different color bands, a project manager can delegate tasks at a glance. GANTT chart is a good presentation tool that shows the main priorities of the project. When project managers allocate and distribute each resource, the entire team will know about it and follow the instructions. The project presentation demonstrates what tasks are dependent on each other. Furthermore, the GANTT chart tends to illustrate several scheduling opportunities in the same graph.