Jung Typology Score ENJT
The Jung typology score is humane metric that explains different personality type. Today, most recruiters use different types of humane metric in their selection process. Some use it to know which candidates would fit into a position in question especially when they consider hiring two or more candidates for similar positions within the same departments.
The Jung Typology Score yields 16 different combinations (personality types) in four dichotomies and each personality type can be assigned a four letter acronym of corresponding combination of preferences.
Extravert (12%):
Extravert (12%) means I have a slight preference of extraversion over introversion. Just like most people that fall within the center of being a little extravert and a little introvert, I fall within the category too. However, there is a preference of the extraversion personality over introversion. As an extravert I like people, meeting people and making friends. I warm up quickly with people and sometimes I prefer to have some quiet moments to myself as well. This is accurate because I do well in Customer Service and or Sales positions. I always have an outstanding performance when it comes to dealing with the public and I believe it is because I have a slight preference personality of extraversion over introversion.
Intuitive (25%):
According to Jung Typology, an intuitive person uses the information he or she receives from within to perceives things while a sense person uses external information to view or perceive things. I have a moderate preference of intuitive over sensing according to Jung Typology of 25% score. It means that I use both dichotomies in different situations but rely more on my intuition. This is accurate because I like a big picture of a scenario to better understand the event or situation before making decisions. I also prefer theoretical to practicalities and dislike routines. I am a future oriented person and enjoy new and unusual things. Since my sensation and intuition are moderate, it means very little percentage of me comes out as being a sensing. Jung typology is accurate in the sense that, in my little self, not every information I perceive is based on my intuition. I also derive external information to draw on concrete decisions especially when it comes to dealing with the public or solving difficult problems. This also goes a long way to explain the fact that I also consider realities in some judgement as I deal with the 16 different types of personalities (cited in Jung Typology Score) in my everyday life.
Thinking (1%):
When it comes to decision making, Jung studied of human behavior claims that we all make decisions based on our thinking or feeling mode. Jung Typology Score gave me 1% on Thinking over Feeling, that implies I have a marginal or no preference of thinking over feeling. Yes, I would say that I agree with that because sometimes I find my thoughts being crowded by my emotions especially when it comes to difficult decision making. Being compassionate and making decisions on your value system is good but not to the detriment of oneself, right? I am sure that I got a score of at least 1% because I make some decisions based on what is right whether I like it or not.
Judging (41%):
I am so excited that Jung Typology Score gave me a 41% of Judging and perceiving personality. My score indicate that I have a moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving, and it is very correct! What an excellent personality dichotomy. I am indeed the blend of the two as indicated. I am a judger on one hand and on the other hand a perceiver. This is just based on the different occasion I find myself. Sometimes I schedule and planned things well in advance and other times, I just act spontaneous especially when there is a change of circumstances or an unexpected scenario occurs. I do act at the last minutes because I wait to explore other possible options.
Works cited
Carl Jung, 1998, Jung Typology Test: Humanmetric Inc. http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp Accessed on May 25, 2016.
