Part 1. General Response
Part 2. Paragraphs and Sentences
The revised title “Significance of the Rhetoric Aspects from a Petition: Allow Open Carry of Firearms at the Quicken Loans Arena during the RNC Convention in July” conveys the specific content of the essay.
Verbs
These are the most ordinary verbs used in the essay:
That being said, since the petition was designed to cater to this specific audience, fallacies pertaining to ethos were used by the writer, assuming that they would generally accepted or fly under the radar due to the audience’s shared political views.
Ethical rhetorical errors which were used include dogmatism and false authority.
Although they would help each of them to be considered “reputable” or even “experts” on this topic of gun rights, it also makes it so that can all be considered very biased.
Scare tactics were used here in many different contexts throughout the entirety of the text.
The last aspect incorporated within every piece of rhetoric is logos which is an appeal to logic and reason.
Substitutions
In this connection, the design of the petition accommodates the specific audiences regarding the idea on ethos presented by the writer that resulted in the understanding of the shared political views.
Dogmatism and false authority appear as ethical errors in the context of the essay.
Being reputable, or an expert on the topic of gun rights does not guarantee clear results with the biased extended assistance.
The scare tactics dominate in the different context of the entire texts.
Lastly, logos as a rhetoric aspect incorporates within the logic and reason of the petition.
Worst Paragraph
The paragraph on page 4 that discussed Pathos, is the worst paragraph. It is the shortest, the undeveloped paragraph in the essay with only two sentences on it. In other words, it does not follow the length consistency of a paragraph. The writer can combine this part to another developed paragraph to add details on the topics discussed. Alternatively, since the paragraph only discussed the emotional appeal and comparison with other rhetorical aspects, it would be better to develop it with more ideas to support its arguments.
Transitions
Particularly, the second and third paragraphs of the essay need improvements in terms of its transition. The third paragraph should come after the introduction, and the second follows after it.
Rewritten Paragraphs
Typically, the academic sources are more reputable compared to non-academic sources. Some sources are reputable with other individuals considering, but others consider it ordinary. In the world of politics, the idea is true as illustrated in the petition. The content of the petition mainly centered on the gun rights as per Second Amendments; it is created to serve those who value and favor the modification, especially the conservatives and republicans. In this connection, the design of the petition accommodates the specific audiences regarding the idea on ethos presented by the writer that resulted in the understanding of the shared political views.
Ethos is a rhetoric aspect that serves as an appeal to ethics and credibility. It plays a vital role to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the petition. The strong ethos has its rhetorical standards that properly and consistently cite reputable and reliable sources. In addition, it has a good reputation for most writers in the utilization of proper writing conventions. When seeking figures of credibility throughout the petition, it functions effectively to those who are using it such as the Republican National Convention (RNC), National Rifle Association (NRA), and some individuals, namely Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz, Ohio Governor John Kasich, and the author of the petition The Hyperationalist.
Three Sentences
Page 2
The petition has assumed that every information written is accepted as a fact. Correspondingly, those who favored the petition from the public seek the significance in accordance with their values and beliefs.
Page 6
Currently, there are 53, 623 signatures and when it reaches the goal, then all the arguments are a success and serve its purpose.
