History of Lynching in America
Lynching was a type of execution practiced by an assembly of vigilantes that aims to instantaneously kill persons who are charged of terrible misdemeanors. However, lynching do not only served as a punishment to criminals and crimes but also served as a type of group communication whose intention was to impose communal conformity concerning social class, sex norms and racial hierarchy.
Lynching comprised violence authorized by the community and the state for which state, local and national governments seldom indicted the persons concerned as well as trials rarely resulted in jail sentences or fines. The mobs in lynching kill accused victims because cruelty fit within trendy notion of community power.
America was ones mockingly termed as the ‘United States of Lyncherdom’ by Mark Twain, a famous writer of culture and life in America. The term was created due to the widespread incidences of lynching in the country.
For instance, there were around 4700 victims of lynching throughout 1982 to 1930. Different races were all victimized by lynching. There was a stretched and catastrophic record of lynching in America. It has existed in every phases of US history, and happened periodically previous to the American Civil War. After the American Civil war however, lynching incidences amplified considerably, and at the conclusion of the nineteenth century, lynching had overwhelmed nearly all areas in the country. Lynching was not only a crime but also a Southern madness that attacked black Americans, who symbolized the majority of lynch victims. It was very common in the southern part of the US to the extent that there were ten times more individuals lynched in the south compared to all other states.
The peak of Southern lynching happened between years 1882 and 1930. There were around 2,800 victims from the South which constitutes the sixty percent of the lynched victims in the United States. Within Jim Crow segregation, a liberal organization of racial oppression and subordination, lynching became a constitutive and systematic element.
Lynching was a representation of black oppression. The mobs in lynching wanted to quickly and cruelly penalize those who despoiled apparently sanctified societal customs and supplied a method wherein the society could cooperatively contribute in capturing and grueling criminals. We can consider lynching, for this matter, as a way of constructing a community and as an extralegal violence.
Lynching was a traditional performance that legalized the ideals of mob partakers and interpreted its edifying implication through social ceremonies formed to show their meaning. Nevertheless, the structure and substance of lynching differ considerably and affected its general sense. The major dissimilarities between lynch mobs were their institution, preparation, permanence, and the area to which they do the lynching ceremonies.
History of Anti-Lynching Movement
Studying lynching began in 1980s. Most of the studies conducted disapproved the act of lynching. Approaches mainly involved utilization of statistics as a way to emphasize the unfairness of the practice of lynching. The records in the Chicago Tribune offered the evidences for the basis of anti-lynching campaigners.
Two of the famous activists of lynching are Ida B. and James E. Cutler. The two initiated the Red Record and Lynch Law respectively, where they investigated the suppositions for clearing up lynching and employed existing information to dismiss lynching mythology.
In support of the Southern Commission on the Study of Lynching (SCIC), Arthur Raper investigated lynching for years and wrote the Tragedy of Lynching 1933. The SCIS aimed to identify what causes lynching how might lynching be abolished as a societal predicament.
The study of lynching was about mob activities and the fundamentals that endorsed these mob deeds. The study showed that the most chief rationalization for lynching was assassination rather than rape. To simply reveal that there were more lynch sufferers accused of murder than rape, it intended to display the viciousness of lynching.
Another study published under the SCIC was the ‘Lynching and the Law’ by James Chadbourn (1933). The study aimed to expound the reasons behind why the law allowed lynching, and on the contrary, how this same law may perhaps be utilized to abolish lynching if the proper actions were done.
Specifically, the studies reveal the association of law implementation, the court structure, and the government as well as the outburst of lynching all throughout the United States. Chadbourn fashioned a concise but comprehensive survey sent to a thousand lawyers, legislators and judges for him to efficiently make his viewpoint.
Lynching studies were mainly about objection on the act of lynching. In the 1980s, lynching study searched to rebuild the record of lynch mob hostility. The records offered comprehensive accounts of well-known lynchings which normally portrayed the so-called crime of the lynching victim.
The records also include the composition and institution of the mob, the sequence of proceedings that escorted to the captivity of the victim, the real-time lynching, along with the reaction of the white community to the lynching. Taking into account the meticulous narration of mob impulse and aggression, their records of lynching usually mistreated black opposition.
The noticeable nonattendance of black struggle can also be interpreted as a strategy. In the study of James McGovern, he concluded that the majority of the blacks reacted dreadfully to the lynching by means of remaining inside the arranged social limitations. He added that the lynch mobs would most likely have been less disposed to fight against black vengeance.
When lynching historians investigated resistance in 1980s, they usually avoided the inquiry of how the black victims and the black community opposed lynching. The investigations commonly look at the accounts of official anti-lynching movements made by the NAACP.
In the middle of 1990s, studies confronted the postulation that the black working class struggle to Jim Crow was unreal. This assumption was mainly influenced by the theory of infrapolitics by James C. Scott.
The theory stated that the exploited groups hardly arrange uprisings against their tyrants. The oppressed crowd usually challenges their oppressors through every day performances of secret opposition, such as fake ignorance, fire-starting, interruptions, and departures.
The passive behavior of the black community was then considered to be a disguised rebellion. This idea was further explained in Brundage’s article, ‘The Roar on the Other Side of Silence’. It supports the theory of Scott and emphasized that emblematic motioned of rebelliousness, dual expressed discursive mutiny, robbery and others were the principal forms of black American struggle to cultural cruelty with reasons that these acts hid black characters and thus were less possible to aggravate white vengeance.
Black resistance to lynching studies focused on the importance of anti-lynching movements. Ida B. Wells’ anti-lynching researches and the other works of different historians have recorded the black and white authors who disapproved racist demonstrations that enable lynching.
The character of black opposition to lynching stays indistinguishable. While historians usually have the same opinion that black confrontation to lynching really happened, it is indistinguishable whether it was mainly typified by planned remonstrations, or equipped opposition.
It was also uncertain to recognize the method of the black communities in expressing reactions to particular lynchings and to evaluate the racist discussions that defended lynching and cultural aggression. There is a limited study on the black resistance to lynching during the peak era because there were only few historians who do a widespread regional investigation.
Defending against Lynching
Elmo Curl was charged of physical attack to a white woman by trying to present her a rude message while she was returning home in Panola County in the year 1910. The incidence’s report in the newspaper told that Curl made an unwanted sexual move. Upon the arrest of Curl for his imprudence, he purportedly shot and lethally injured Miller Curl, white manager of a plantation. These consecutive incidences made a white group to arrange and started hunt the nearby districts with the intention of capturing Curl. The story described Curl as a ‘negro desperado’.
The description is expected to cause and arouse lynching reactions and supplied the investigating group with an expedient defense to exercise unwarranted power in arresting Curl. The first group was unsuccessful to arrest Curl. Curl has run away and had gone over six hundred miles to Kansas where he was finally arrested by McHenry, a Deputy Sherriff in Arkansas.
The reason why Curl escaped to Kansas City was uncertain, but maybe he had family in the city who decided to offer him a momentary protected refuge. McHenry’s reason and method on capturing Curl were also uncertain, but it came into view that his drive came from the monetary prize he received upon the arrest. Curl was offered to the lynch mob and was brought to the location of the suspected attack and hung him in a tree.
This particular story of lynching depicts the typical responses of black lynch victims. The black suspect will first search for protection from friends and family. Blacks charged of crimes such as rape or murder seldom turned themselves in to authorities governed by white people. They chose to travel longer distances to get away from a lynch mob. This flight might provide the victims and their families the best option to escape the lynching. Nevertheless, black suspects were commonly revealed by white authorities or lynch mobs while fleeing. In many occasions, black suspects rejected to give in and aggressively protected themselves since they doubt the white subjugated legal scheme.
The black negative response to submission also mirrors a custom of armed self-preservation and a radical black mannish philosophy for which equipped opposition was realized as a tolerable and obligatory survival strategy. The blacks are rarely exposed to fierce retaliation against whites whom they supposed were accountable for a lynching to happen.
The black attempts of flight and resistance as a reaction to probable lynchings may be interpreted as an element rather than as disconnected reactions. For that reason, flight and armed resistance make up the overriding black reactions to projected lynch mob aggression.
Conclusion
Suspects accused of raping or murdering had little opportunity to protect them from lynch mob aggression. Generally, blacks cannot depend on the legal structure and government to reasonably deliver judgment to their cases for the reason that the criminal justice system dominated by white people normally reputed their guilt.
Moreover, if a black suspect submit himself to the system, the white police officers possibly will readily offered the black suspect to the lynch mob and even joined in the lynching. Consequently, submission and capture generally assisted a ‘legal lynching.’
In the attempt to escape form lynching, suspects seek refuge to family members. When they were arrested by authorities, they would fight and defend violently and would refuse to surrender. Violent disagreements with white people were first avoided by black people because black armed resistance frequently annoyed white militant aggression against the whole black society. Blacks aggressively protected themselves because armed oppositions was their last option and also because armed self-protection provided the leeway of stopping a lynching of a family member or friend despite the danger of immense white retaliation.
In general, black proletariat strategy was not able to stop lynchings. Armed conflicts with whites only worsen racial stress that led the institution of more white mobs. Frequently, white groups let loose hostility against innocent African American onlookers. Resistance to lynching labels the blacks as submissive.
Furthermore, blacks who bravely rebel to whites were probably be observed as heroes inside the black society and consequently offered rebellious representations for other blacks to pursue. The armed resistance and flight formed the history mob aggression despite their failure to stop lynching from happening.
Bibliography
Ayers, Edward L. Vengeance and Justice: Crime and Punishment in the 19th Century American South. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Berlin, Ira. Slaves No More: Three Essays on Emancipation and the Civil War Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh. Where these Memories Grow: History, Memory, and Southern Identity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh. Under Sentence of Death: Lynching in the South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
Chadbourn, James Harmon. Lynching and the Law. The University of North Carolina. Social Study Series. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1933.
Cha-Jua, Sundiata Keita. “‘A Warlike Demonstration’: Legalism, Violent Self- Help, and Electoral Politics in Decatur, Illinois, 1894–1898." Journal of Urban History 26, no. 5 (2000): 591–629.
Franklin, John Hope and Loren Schweninger. Runaway Slaves: Rebels on the Plantation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Galveston Daily News (Galveston, TX), [NewspaperArchive.com], May 17, 1910, p.
Grant, D. The Anti-Lynching Movement, 1883–1932. San Francisco: R and E Research Associates, 1975.
Gunning, Sandra. Race, Rape, and Lynching: The Red Record of American Literature, 1890–1912. Race and American Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Hall, Jacqueline. Revolt Against Chivalry: Jesse Ames and the Women’s Campaign Against Lynching. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
McGovern, James R. Anatomy of a Lynching: The Killing of Claude Neal. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1982.
Raper, Arthur Franklin and Southern Commission on the Study of Lynching. The Tragedy of Lynching. University of North Carolina. Social Study Series. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1933.
Tolnay, Stewart Emory and E. M. Beck. A Festival of Violence: An Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882–1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1995.
Wells-Barnett, Ida B. On Lynchings. Classics in Black Studies Series. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books, 2002; 1892.
Woodruff, Nan Elizabeth. American Congo: The African American Freedom Struggle in the Delta. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003.
