Good Troubling Justice Through The Rule Of Law Critical Thinking Example

The main force behind the author’s idea to come up with this article was mainly to discuss some important factors about the international law. The law applies to all regardless of their status in the community at large; that is the world at large and more specifically those bound with the said laws. It includes both the powerful and the weak in terms of structures. The law is believed to be having some of its dark side despite its application to the members that subscribed to it. The author puts it that, “its uses by the powerful, its implication in imperialism, its capacity to facilitate exploitation and many of its dark sides”.
It is clear that some people come up with the idea of assimilation with an intention for neutrality and ensuring that the culture of the people are similar to their, but instead they practice hypocrisy in that they are just interest in eroding other people’s culture like in the case of Sierra Leone where they came with the idea of liberalism but in turn they focused in gaining more from the country in the form of taking control of their natural resources. This one is evident in the article as brought out clearly by the author (P.4)
The article talks of the pretentious activity of the Western of trying to be like the Third world nation. They presume that their customary law is not valid and hence the needs to have them embrace their own culture prompting them to abandon their desired ancestral culture. The author brings it clearly that the rule of law put the priority of the less fortunate in the society ahead and their desired needs but in turn makes it difficult to enjoy their rights (p.15). this with reference to the author brings a clear comparison in that the powerful nations sign treaties by assuring the Third World nations that there is the international law that will help protect the rights of all members while in the real sense, they are considered to be counter imperial to the international law and does not have any implication to their operation. They are mostly interested in getting control of the economic status of such countries.
The rule is vital as put by the author in article (p. 17) that it prevents the possibility of conflict occurrence. This one is achieved by ensuring that multiculturalism of the society is brought under one rule of law through assimilation. And in comparison to the other article, the author brings it clear (p. 375) that it would be wise for the superpowers to cede their intention of decolonization and then embark on the economic empowerment of the society as one way of fostering unity and finally respecting the rule of law.
The main impending issue that made the author to come to the rescue of the people who were physically bound by the international law was the issue of some people using it to their benefits. The author describes it like a dual quality international law, the law has both imperial and counter-imperial implications and this makes the author to describe the law as ghost of goods since it has many vices which in real sense is only targeting the innocent according to point as described by the author. At some points, the author exposes that the international law has been used to create some relations between power and the ways of exploiting the weak within the society at large.
Some reasons that the author brings out in the article is the issue of the law seeking to explore some developing countries that is the Third World countries through some ways of exploitation and aim to achieve their political and economic goals in return. The superpowers apply the issues of decolonization, which is permanent way of exercising continuous and permanent sovereignty over some natural resources within a given nation. This is an example of rights’ deprivation and continuous ruling despite the gaining of the independence by such third world countries.
It is believed nearly by everybody that the rule of law should help one be safe from the idea of the tyranny and lack of democracy in the given nation. This may help in restoring peace in such countries in case there were some cases of turmoil. The author brings the issue of the “universal” which is commonly used to refer to the international law which I believed to be a uniting factor for all that is bound together by the international law. The term is believed not to be applying to all since some are using it to their advantage and in turn exploit their partners bound by the same law. The law at some points does not apply to the superpowers.
The issue of the decolonization has been given center stage by the author since the superpowers were using to gain more from the third world countries by pretending to be applying the law of universality which never was either, their intention was to get material benefit then pretend to be protecting them from other invaders. They majorly protected the foreign investments in which in return benefited them wholly (P.48)
The Third World were not given chance to know more about their rights as spelt out in the international law, instead they could try to get the truth but they will still be gagged from knowing the truth enshrined in the document of universality. They could not be able to demand for their rightful share at any given point since the issue of the rationality was in operation and gave out fouls claims that universality was applicable to all. This kind of the dynamic was majorly generated by the instability within the international rule of law.
At some point where decision concerning the economic status of some Third World nations were being tabled, they could not be able to contribute and be given time to air their grievances and come up with a solution with the help of the developed nations but instead, they are represented in nearly everything and even voting is done on their behalf. Like in the case of the aim to establish economic agreement which was held parallel as outlined by the author in Bretton Woods conference which did not come as a surprise but the fact as expected in that it had the signatures of the superpowers like the USA. It was crystal clear that the US was having enough power to control the market position of the world with respect to her stamp in the conference. These posed the dark side of the international law with respect to the less fortunate in the union and were still bound by the same law (P.51).