How Evolution Might Be Compatible With Deity Existence Essays Examples

Philosophers have increasingly developed theories and perceptions explaining the existence of the universe. Although human beings are still under the down of the scientific age, it is evident that the universe existence is handwork by an intelligent creator. All knowledge and discoveries as a result of the scientific spirit and faith based beliefs approach even nearer to God’s awareness. This article will analyze the works and arguments of great philosophers; Cressy Morrison and Dawkins on their contribution about God existence.
Morrison argued that, for scientific reasons about the nature of the universe, scientists believe in God’s existence. The efficient functioning nature of the universe is just like a machine made by an intelligent being. Man made machines function automatically as per the expectations of the controller. They work efficiently with no error as they are prompted to do so. If such like machines can operate intelligently, the case is no different to the natural functioning of the universe. Morrison provides a proof through his reasons as to why scientists believe in God. He suggested that if by faith, the universe operates like a machine, God the creator must be an intelligent being. Through mathematical laws generated by engineering works, the design of the universe executes great engineering intelligence. Its natural functioning does not happen by chance. Life resourcefulness exists to accomplish all purposes in the universe is also an all rounded intelligent work. All life aspects that the universe has have a reason to exist. This concurs with any part that constitutes a machine. Other Morrison’s reasons include the infused instinct of wisdom executed by animals, the power of reasoning a man has over animals and gene wonder phenomena of the provision nature for all living organisms. The effect of imagination pours all evidence that a man can think of relating to what transpires the universe.
On the other hand, Dawkins suggests that evolution theory is sufficient and can be relies on to explaining the world and living things. As Morrison does not go further to suggests reliable evidence, Dawkins brings cite the theory of evolution. As an undisputed fact, evolution finds its ground within the scientific community. However, through cultural and religious beliefs among different societies in different locations, people perceive the creation of the universe differently. Most of them believe that man, current world condition and all that exists in the universe in made possible through evolution. However, God has a hand in all the processes. Dawkins emphasizes this ideology through his improbability argument. Taking into account all the consciousness and intelligent functioning of the universe, Dawkins suggests that God, the creator must be far away from being simple. The act of invoking God through explanations of complex things such as fine tuning of everything at place in the universe shows that God is more than improbable. Therefore it becomes more unreasonable for people to believe in Him. Dawkins further argues that a physical probability of any claim increases the chance of faith in which people can put on. Epistemic probability claims the truthfulness of a thing. Therefore, objectively improbable things may not be epistemic probable. These are some of the ideological thoughts that the two philosophers may refute. However, they both agree on some aspects like the evolution theory and the universe existence in a scientific view.