Introduction
A collaborative working in social and healthcare setting is very important for the defenseless individuals or patients needing due attention. There are numerous benefits associated to working collaboratively, however some of the important are the seamless evaluations for the information to a couple of experts, reformed the flow of information amid the experts, enhanced efficacy of care setup comprehensively, integrated care provision, and advanced blueprinting and commissioning care for ensuring complement attitudes to be represented by the social and healthcare establishments instead unsettling each other. However, there are as well issues linked with working collaboratively but the benefits overcome the disadvantages. In simpler terms, it would not be wrong to claim that if an economy wishes to reform the survival of sufferers, it should focus on ensuring the effective collaborative functioning between the social and healthcare establishments (Samuel). This essay shades light on the significance of working in partnership in social and healthcare setting. Particularly, a review of the case study is made and different areas are highlighted so that readers of this paper will be able to know the importance of the subject in the specific scenario. The findings established in this paper are expected to add value in the literature so that readers underpin their concepts further regarding collaborative working in social and healthcare.
Main Body
Working Philosophy in Partnership
When it comes to determining a bundle of opportunities when an effective interaction between social employees and healthcare workplaces is considered, the contribution of partnership in terms of wellbeing and social care is found to be influential (Glasby, Dickinson and Miller). Indeed, the landmark regarding the partnership philosophy appears the notion concerning the sufferers’ requirements along with the comprehensive series of service delivery which is specifically significant for seniors suffering from injury, who evidently showed dependence on social upkeep and wellbeing services. Moreover, it is indicated in a research that the social upkeep and wellbeing partnership enables the social care and health workplaces to offer an extensive series of amenities to the sufferers (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). For instance, numerous individuals who have chronic clinical situations are unable to be counted on social upkeep as there is no awareness regarding the subject upkeep or are unable to contribute in associated platforms because of their incapacity. Rather, in social upkeep and well-being concerning partnerships, a growing tendency pertaining to the collaboration amid social care and health workplaces is observed. Consequently, the role of social care organization is significant in caring patient if he or she is recommended through a physician. In simpler terms, the partnership philosophy involves the officials associated with social and healthcare organizations and they care patients who are helpless and require attention. Due to the appealing standards established by the social and healthcare officials, the quality of healthcare service to the patients gets improved.
A review of the case shows that it is not advisable to treat social and healthcare partnership as useful in every respect. The reasons highlighted were professional ignorance and improper communication. All at once, the partnership integration in just a single workplace reveals the hazard of manipulation along with inadequate utilization of the partnership and this ultimately advantages workplace in contrast to the patients. Therefore, it would not be wrong to assert that this case claims partnership which would not be favorable for patients.
Partnership Relationships
The desirable partnership relationship within social and healthcare services appears probable solely on the criteria of influential observation and dominance concerning the behavior depicted by experts who are responsible to meet the standards regarding social and healthcare (Dickinson 375-383). The concerned officials productively response to the patients as they are aware about the existence of monitoring and control standards; will resist them in violating the directives with respect to the health and social care. Therefore, the presence of monitoring and control standards is preferable within social and healthcare services.
The review of the case in terms of partnership relationship reveals deficiency pertaining to effective monitoring and control of the officials responsible for health and social care. Due to the stated situation, ultimately patients experience the negative influence in terms of adequate social and healthcare. It is the responsibility of the public bodies to establish measures which must ensure due monitoring and control on the individuals so that they must adhere to the principles of providing effective health and social care to the patients and it is possible only through effective partnership relationship amid them which is possible through effective monitoring and controlling standards to be set by the concerned body.
Partnership Models
The partnership’s behavior is dependent on application of diverse models noted in health and social care setting. Concerning that, it appears probable to differentiate numerous long-term directives for developing the partnership models in the stated setting (Carnwell and Carson). Preliminary, a model which reveals a comprehensive engagement of the public body in terms of partnership along with the controlling establishment which is inducted and monitored by the official bodies is known as the social and healthcare partnership model. This model expresses a due interference of the public body as evident through the compliance of rules by the social and healthcare experts. Nevertheless, the social and healthcare partnership model does not perform effectively in case of administrators who are not sound with the health and social care partnership. Here, the extensive involvement of the public body is not desirable. All at once, the emergence of bureaucracy is dependent on strict control of the public body and this ultimately reduces the success ratio in the social and healthcare partnership.
A review of the case shows that the dominated partnership concerning the public body appears consistent when it comes to monitoring the availability values and benchmarks in the domain of social and healthcare. Due to the effective involvement of the public body, a lower tendency of hazard is observed because of the strict compliance of rules by the social and healthcare workplaces as levied by the public body do not allow workers to employ deficient performance. The subject model is as well effective as the government is liable for ensuring the social care of the patients offered by diverse social care establishments, whereas healthcare organizations are responsible to ensuring the adequate health of the patients. This partnership model effectively integrates health and social care establishments with the public body for achieving the intended objectives. The role of private financiers is significant as they provide necessary funds to the health and social care models. This case uncovers the due involvement of private establishments in terms of social and healthcare. However, the public body has the privilege to avert them to deviate from the preliminary guidelines in terms of the human privileges.
Current Legislation and Organizational Practices
It is important to mention that there are organizations which provide social and healthcare services together to the patients in order to develop their status in the market place. However, it is necessary that these organizations must be monitored and controlled through the official public body. It is evident in the case due to the inattention of the public body, the patient suffered badly as deficient attitudes were found to be implemented by the officials responsible for providing health and social care services to the patients.
The Health and Social Care Act Of 2012 involves lawful points in terms of partnerships employed in health and social care setting. Nevertheless, this Act fundamental demands the reform in the worth of services provided to the patients in terms of health and social care. An evaluation of the case shows that people are compelled to demand official alterations for ensuring the security of the patients admitted in social and healthcare workplaces as inadequate behaviors were reflected from the experts. It was suggested by Cameron to reform the care of sufferers, improve the answerability of clinics, and ensure satisfactory basis in the National Health Service. Moreover, a proposal to appoint the fresh chief investigator of clinic was given (Limentani 394-398). Hence, an innovative official attempt employed by the public body in terms of reforming control and observation in social and healthcare is found. It is expected from the public body to ensure strict compliance in terms of health and social care organizations engaged in providing the services to the patients so that such case as uncovered in the case study must not be reported again.
Working Practices, Policies and Collaborative Working
If variations are found in exercises and rules in the social and healthcare setting then this situation reveals unfavorable influences on the partnerships and execution of joint tasks. Indeed, they as well offer misapprehensions amid social and health care experts (Coddington, Fischer and Moore). Ultimately, the patients would be suffered as they are unable to be treated effectively. An appraisal of the case study outlines that a significant violation of exercising rules is observed as employed by the social and healthcare establishments.
Possible Partnership Outcomes
The probable results of partnerships are found to be extremely debated in social and healthcare setting (Petch, Cook and Miller 623-633). If there is a partnership between health and social care establishments then it would be favorable for the patients because they receive social and healthcare services together rather receiving one among them. Therefore, the public body is required to promote the establishments which consider providing health and social care services together to the patients.
The health and social care partnership may reveal unfavorable outcomes in terms of Medical Trust and Adult-A case. The health social care experts may independently claim different reasons if they are found failure in providing adequate services to the patients. The healthcare professionals show that they are failed to provide adequate clinical service to the patients as patients received inappropriate service from the social care providers. On the other hand, the social care experts may assert that they were unable to provide effective services to the patient as the healthcare experts did not appropriately provide the health care to the patients.
Potential Barriers before Partnership
If differences are found in terms of exercising rules then this situation offers a negative influence on the partnership between health and social care establishments (Coddington, Fischer and Moore). Moreover, differences in communication between health and social care establishments are found to be significant in terms of the health of patients. For instance, either health or social care establishment communicates improper information to each other; then both the establishments will experience difficulty in terms of procuring adequate health to the patients as most of the elements pertaining to the patients are skipped due to the communication gap between the social and healthcare establishments. Moreover, the division of functions must be clearly mentioned so that each establishment must know its responsibility and not interfere in either of their business so that effective partnership between them could be fulfilled.
Strategies for Partnership’s Improvement
Different strategies exist to reform the partnership results in the social and healthcare setting; nevertheless keeping in view the case study few important strategies are suggested. There must be no variations when it comes to ensuring compliance of the rules by social and healthcare establishments. Secondly, there is a need of integration between social and health care professionals in order to ensure coherence between them. A desirable integration is expected to reveal the quality outcomes as the problems are identified beforehand and advanced measures are established to tackle the issues. Thirdly, the partnership between social and healthcare establishments must be monitored and controlled through the public body so that they must not deviate from the preliminary guidelines imparted to them so that the risks must be minimized. Finally, the absence of communication gaps ensures correct flow of the information between the health and social care professionals and this allows them to understand the issues of patients effectively. This ultimately ensures adequate delivery of the care to the patients.
Conclusion
The social partnership along with the partnership in health appeared significant in terms of the situation concerning Adult A and Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. Nevertheless, all at once, this case uncovers the accountability issues regarding the officials responsible for ensuring adequate health care for patients, and the social employees who are responsible to provide health care and social services to the patients with superiority. Therefore, it is necessary that the emergence of appealing rules to be made which are able to manage the strict dominance in terms of the healthcare services procured to the sufferers, specifically the senior citizens of the economy and sufferers that require added attention. The subject scenario meaningfully impacted the economy, and activated the stress given by the civic on the public bodies and other official public bodies to promote the recent legislature in order to reform the worth concerning health care and social services. Moreover, this case study shows that the recent regulation regarding social and healthcare in the United Kingdom is found to be deficient. All at once, the health and social care partnership is found to be soon to be. Certain needs exist about the consideration of measures for enhancing the partnerships between social and healthcare establishments to be considered by the policymakers along with reforming public control on their performance is required to be noticed.
Works Cited Page
Carnwell, Ros and Alex Carson. "The Concepts Of Partnership And Collaboration". N.p., 2016. Web. 27 Apr. 2016.
Coddington, Dean C, Elizabeth A Fischer, and Keith D Moore. Strategies For The New Health Care Marketplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001. Print.
"Coordinating Care For Adults With Complex Care Needs In The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Challenges And Solutions | PCMH Resource Center". Pcmh.ahrq.gov. N.p., 2012. Web. 27 Apr. 2016.
Dickinson, Helen. "The Evaluation Of Health And Social Care Partnerships: An Analysis Of Approaches And Synthesis For The Future". Health Soc Care Community 14.5 (2006): 375-383. Web.
Glasby, Jon, Helen Dickinson, and Robin Miller. "Partnership Working In England—Where We Are Now And Where We’Ve Come From". Int J Integr Care 11.5 (2011): n. pag. Web.
Limentani, A E. "The Role Of Ethical Principles In Health Care And The Implications For Ethical Codes.". Journal of Medical Ethics 25.5 (1999): 394-398. Web.
Petch, Alison, Ailsa Cook, and Emma Miller. "Partnership Working And Outcomes: Do Health And Social Care Partnerships Deliver For Users And Carers?". Health Soc Care Community (2013): 623-633. Web.
Samuel, Mithran. "Expert Guide To Health And Social Care Joint Working - Community Care".Community Care. N.p., 2011. Web. 27 Apr. 2016.
