Compare the Biblical doctrine of creation with the 20th-century scientific explanation of the origins of the universe (e.g. the “Big Bang”). Your comparison should include some assessment of the ultimate compatibility or incompatibility of the two teachings
In today’s world there are as of now two broadly acknowledged exploratory speculations clarifying how planet earth was shaped. Creationists trust that God made the sky and the earth, and that God said let there be light, and there was light. Creationists don't trust that arbitrary events of nature started the start of life as we probably am aware it. Creationists trust that God made a full grown earth, and delivered man complete in His picture. Evolutionists, then again, trust that the universe blasted from a little molecule. Schroeder argues, basically, is that the biblical account of creation in six days can be read as taking place over six _literal_ days -- and that not only does this reading fail to conflict with modern science, indeed science itself supports that reading. The solution? The six days are "God's time," reckoned from within one frame of reference, and the millions of years with which science deals are "earth time," reckoned from within another. The two are reconciled by the theory of relativity.
There are as of now two broadly acknowledged exploratory speculations clarifying how planet earth was shaped. Creationists trust that God made the sky and the earth, and that God said let there be light, and there was light. Creationists don't trust that arbitrary events of nature started the start of life as we probably am aware it. Creationists trust that God made a full grown earth, and delivered man complete in His picture. Evolutionists, then again, trust that the universe blasted from a little molecule.
The Big Bang Theory is the predominant logical hypothesis concerning the cause of the universe . As per the Big Bang Theory, the universe was made somewhere around 10 and 20 billion years back. A monstrous astronomical blast discharged radiation, particles, and billows of iotas into the environment. Before this gigantic blast happened, the aggregate matter and vitality of space contained totally at a certain point. Evolutionists can't say nonetheless, what existed before this occasion. The Big Bang made particles be tossed outward, and to proceed in an extending nature. After the Big Bang, the universe was exceptionally hot, and when it began to chill, that is the point at which the arrangement of particles started to frame together. The particles that framed together were called the building pieces of matter, photons, electrons, and quarks. Gravity soon assumed control, and consolidated every one of the iotas into systems of stars. A wonder that happens when a star kicks the bucket and blasts is a supernova. At the point when the stars blasted they made new sorts of iotas, which discharged once more into the world and united with grandiose dust and particles. At that point these arrangements consolidated to frame planets. Numerous more occasions occurred and microbes framed on earth, which advanced into the human structure we know today.
Creation Theory
The Bible says that earth was created before the stars and that trees were created before the sun. (Genesis 1: 14-19) However, the Big Bang view teaches the exact opposite. The Bible tells us that the earth was created as a paradise; the secular model teaches it was created as a molten blob. The Big Bang and the Bible certainly do not agree about the past doubtful. This information sheds doubt on the Big Bang Theory. Although there are many more instances where evidence has been found to disprove the Big Bang Theory, this explanation of the origin of the universe is still widely accepted by scientists and astrologists in the scientific community
Numerous individuals don't understand that the enormous detonation is a story concerning the past as well as what’s to come. The most well-known rendition of the huge explosion shows that the universe will extend forever and in the end come up short on usable vitality. As per the story, it will stay that course perpetually called heat death even though it is cold. But the Bible shows that the world will be judged and changed. Heaven will be restored. The enormous detonation denies this pivotal scriptural instructing.
There are a number of other scientific problems with the big bang theory and there are certainly enough inconsistencies to not accept it on bind faith as truth. Some of the premises are completely untrue even as regards current science information without regarding the higher authority of God. As an example of this is the flatness principle. As a test to the huge explosion model, there is concurrent issue of the flatness or levelness issue. The growth rate of the universe seems, by all accounts, to be finely adjusted with the power of gravity; this condition is known as flat. In the event that the universe were the coincidental by-result of a huge explosion, it is hard to envision how such an incredible happenstance could happen. Enormous detonation cosmology can't clarify why the matter thickness in the universe isn't more noteworthy, making it breakdown upon itself (shut universe), or less, bringing on the universe to quickly fly separated (open universe).
1 The Flatness or Levelness Principle
The issue is extreme when we look back into the past. Since any deviation from impeccable levelness tends to increment as time goes on, since after that the universe more likely than not been much more accurately adjusted in the past than it is today. In this manner, the enormous detonation, the universe would have been practically level or flat to a great degree high exactness. This more likely than not has been the situation (accepting the enormous detonation). The laws of material science take into account a limitless scope of qualities, that is true but this theory is a little hard to believe as it surpasses the belief limit. Obviously, in the creation model, "parity" is normal since the Lord has adjusted the universe forever.
The Big Bang theory does not take into account the gases that make up about 90% of the universe. Recall that the enormous detonation assumes that matter (hydrogen and helium gas) was made from vitality as the universe extended. Notwithstanding, trial material science lets us know that at whatever point matter is made from vitality, such a response additionally creates antimatter. Antimatter has comparative properties to matter, with the exception of the charges of the particles are turned around. (So while a proton has a positive charge, an antiproton has a negative charge.) Any response where vitality is changed into matter delivers a precisely break even with measure of antimatter; there are no known special cases. The enormous detonation (which has regardless of in the first place, just vitality) ought to have created precisely approach measures of matter and antimatter, and that ought to be what we see today. In any case, we don't. The unmistakable universe is contained totally of matter— there are no measures of antimatter anyplace. This staggering issue for the huge explosion is really reliable with scriptural creation; it is an outline highlight. God made the universe to be basically matter just—and it is ideal that He did. Whenever matter and antimatter meet up, they fiercely crush each other. In the event that the universe had square with measures of matter and antimatter (as the huge explosion requires), life would not be conceivable.
Creationists are a group of individuals who don't acknowledge the Big Bang Theory. These individuals say that it is unlikely that a blast made the universe, since it says in the book of Genesis in the Bible that God made the sky and the earth. A few reasons why creationists don't trust that the Big Bang happened are on the idea that sacred text says all components were shaped together, while the Big Bang expresses that components other than hydrogen and helium framed after many years. Sacred writing additionally says that earth was shaped before the stars, while the Big Bang Theory expresses that earth was framed long after the stars. God likewise says in His statement that the sun, moon, and stars were framed together. The Big Bang Theory says that the sun was framed from more established stars.
Conclusion
The Bible as God’s word is full of references as to His creation of the universe. The big bang theory is just that as has been disproved in just a few examples in this paper. Many people though still adhere to this measurement of the creation of the universe. The story of Job comes to mind when he questioned the authority of God and the Lord said to Job, “Shall the one who contends with the almighty corrects Him? He who rebukes God: let him answer it” (Job 40:1-3). Job was smart enough to plead humility after that statement from God. Job professed his humility. Job cannot answer the question of God, “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements? Surely you know!” (Job 38: 4-6).
God is pretty clear here that He made heaven and earth. The number of times that this appears in the Bible is numerous. The Genesis starts the creation story and it continues through the Book of Revelation when it ends as we know it. Job, Psalms, Proverbs, all speak to the stars and the sun and the moon as part of the story in their time.
Both creation and the Big Bang Theory have been found to have proof supporting every side. The unbelievable amount of proof accumulated by researchers offers credit to creation, furthermore gives confirmation to the Big Bang Theory. In any case, humankind will never really know the root of the universe, and one's perspective on the level headed discussion is for the most part molded by that's individual convictions. Personally, there is not discernment between the two theories as the religious theory still points to the fact that God did create all in the world. That would presuppose that the Big Bang Theory was all part of the universe. To the God who is the maker of all the ability of the Big Bang to occur would be under the view of God’s omniscient being. There is not any scientific explanation that is beyond that of God and to think that the theories of Big Bang, Darwin, Einstein or any other scientist is opposed to the workings of God does not give God credit as the maker of all.
The Big Bang Theory leaves many loopholes to be answered especially the one of the original cause of the movement or big bang in the first place. If God had not created all the elements what would have caused the movement of all the particles and the ability for them to coagulate into a ball. None of the proposed answers address this original cause of the big bang. Most theorist start with after it was created. Disproving that God was the original creator has been quite a challenge for the Big Bang theorist and not one that has been overcome to answer the first origin question. Some speculate that the glow of the skies microwave emissions thorough the universe is a proof positive of the big bang explosion. However this radiation is similar to satellite transmissions and in no way explains the first consideration as to what is the original source of the materials. Therefore it is the contention in this paper that without evidence to show that the big bang originated the particulars in this theory, my opinion would be as always that God is the creator.
.
Works Cited
Gish, Duane. "The Big Bang Theory Collapses." Institute for Creation Research 12 March 2012. Web http://www.icr.org/article/big-bang-theory-collapses/.
Hassen, Brad. "Big Bang Theory." National Geographic 14 March 2014. Web. science.nationalgeographic.com//origins-u.
Lisle, Jason. "Does the Big Bang Fit with the Bible?" 15 April Answers in Genesis: 2010. Web. https://answersingenesis.org/big-bang/does-the-big-bang-fit-with-the-bible/.
Maxwell, John. Leadership Bible. Nashville TN. 2002. Print pp.23.
Schroeder, G. Genesis and the Big Bang Theory. Bantam:: New York. 1991 Web. http://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Big-Bang-Discovery-Harmony/dp/0553354132
