The aim of this paper is to discuss the three different theoretical frameworks that comparative criminology is based upon. Comparative criminology can be defined as an investigation of criminal justice system and wrongdoings in connection to the geopolitical, cultural and historical frameworks. The review, in this way, draws the development of a portion of the standards that may have been embraced by specific states and their diverse sources. The review additionally empowers the perception of remote arrangements and how they may influence a specific country in connection to wrongdoing. In addition, the review empowers the comprehension and the forecast of various factors in the legal framework. The recorded setting empowers appreciation of the source of a portion of the state approaches about the convention of that specific state. The control and the impact of violations are identified with the social issues, the development of the ill-disposed procedures and the despotic strategies. The constancy investigation of the criminal equity framework and the violations has shown that globalization has demonstrated the criticalness in considering the criminal equity frameworks of different countries. Information blast has prompted to the advancement of the exploration of the near criminology by the arrangement of information from the legal procedures and statutes of different countries (Howard et al, 2000) Comparative criminology, accordingly, assumes a basic part in the agreement of justice and helps to comprehend the method of reasoning behind the distinctive determinations that a court may come to as to the geopolitical, verifiable and social structures.
Therefore, it is worth pointing out that he three frameworks should be viewed as follows pertaining to an inverted triangle:
Historical framework Cultural framework
Geopolitical framework
Reference
Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2000). Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology. Criminal justice, 4(4), 139-211.
