Advantages/benefits
a) After Japan’s strenuous and prolonged struggle with depression all the way through the 1990’s, nevertheless, numerous spectators, whether outside or inside Japan have questioned the efficiency of some customary Japanese administrative strategies. Example: Numerous of these methods were attributed with assisting to uplift the Japanese financial system to its existing position as the world’s next largest after the United Sates of America, and thus enabling the Japanese businesses, in particular the manufacturing segment, to be more aggressive than their international equivalent.
b) As a consequence, during the 21st century, the Japanese administrative modus operandi are ever in a state of fluctuation, as business leaders and scholars equally re-evaluate which procedures are ideal and which are not.
c) Even though the Japanese management system and economic stratagems got documented in the Western nations, in the postwar period, their starting points are substantially older. Generally and directly, their genesis may be documented up to the 19th century, whilst a Western prejudiced transformation plan started during the new monarchy which was started in the re-establishment of the Meiji in 1868. Example: As a reaction to the harsh European migration familiarity of its Asian neighborhood, the innovative Japanese administration started to release the society and economy to the then controlled external influences so as to keep off any Western invaders.
d) Harukiyo argues that (1998, p.123-377) the closing down of buffer stocks, centralized excellence control and independence of the industrial engineer have all been queried within Japanese concepts. Example: Such innovations have reversed certain features of conservative production management, but the central tenets of mass production.
e) A number of noticeably contemporary practices came about in the Meiji period and subsequently, while the Japanese financial system was yet shedding the paraphernalia of feudalism after centuries of the foreigners being kept out and the dawdling technical development, serious emphasis was put on developing the domestic simulation and modernism on Western merchandise, instead of depending on imports. This practice was summed up with a slogan of the period, "Japanese spirit, and Western technology" writes Harukiyo (1998, p.123-377). Example: Japanese workers participation is distinctive insofar as it unequivocally involves them in industrial engineering. Example: The precise meaning and distinctiveness of this involvement originates from the wider innovation in production management, such as just-in-time (Kanban) and the incessant learning program (Kaizen), as well as other characteristics of Japanese personnel practice.
f) The idiosyncratic element of the Japanese management model is the superior role given to workers’ knowledge. Dirks avers that for a few, (1999, p. 289) this may perhaps simply be a further example of the expropriation by the management of workers’ skills and thus the perfection of Taylorism but for others it might point to the continual failure of Taylorism.
Disadvantages/limitations
a) This objective to preserve the temperament of the Japanese culture and the self-sufficiency of the economy was seen even during the 20th-century practices of both the micro and macroeconomic levels. In the nationalized economy it is demonstrated by ancient limitations either direct or circumlocutory on importation into Japan and the attendant trade surplus which Japan has been unrelenting for years.
b) At the corporation echelon, the same motivation assists in illuminating the commonness of the Japan’s keiretsu, the hefty and all-inclusive relatives of mutually dependent companies worked for their own banks for instance, Sumitomo, Mitsubishi and Hitachi. In hypothesis, the firms can circumvent "importing" their unprocessed materials, apparatus, or even funds from foreign companies by getting these commodities from their widespread institutions. Example: In this viewpoint the Japanese management model would merely be making what is going on nonetheless, that is, the exercising of implicit skills. However the billion dollar question begs. Can the participation of workers in job design under the Japanese management model then be treated as one of the distinctive factors?
c) Formal education for managers is not well advanced at the undergraduate level and the undergraduate education is not observed by firms as a means of accomplish business skills, and these firms base their hiring assessment less on a recruit's comprehension than on general traits such as ambition and character. At the same time, the firms do not hire recruits to fill particular jobs but instead the employees are expected to be impressionable, and to identify with the common interests of the firm than with their explicit role within it. However Herbig (1997, p. 199-207) notes that the mentor method is extensively used in the early training of management recruits and engrosses the middle-level and senior managers who serve as teachers and role models.
Limitations
a) Based on these and further past customs, a number of the additional main applications which are usually related to Japanese administration systems incorporate:
internal training of managers;
agreeable and spread out supervisory;
widespread employment of quality control techniques;
cautiously codified work values;
prominence on producing pleasant relations among workers;
life employ service and promotion-based reimbursement.
b) McMillan (1996, p. 199) articulates that it is imperative to notice down that these are sweeping statements coming from the conservative method and there have constantly been disparity, and some features of these practices have been progressively more re-evaluated the in past years. The teaching of executives in Japan by tradition happens on a comparatively comfortable foundation within the firms.
c) The fraction of chief executives who went to university is above average and are comparable to that in the Western Europe and United States of America. Nevertheless, a small number of Japanese executives have been through graduate colleges in contrast to their United States of America and European equivalent.
d) As a matter of fact, there is just one Japanese university proffers a degree associated to an MBA, which is a chief official document for executives in the U.S. The importance on internal education is interconnected to the time-honored life span employment method, in which administration employees are hired each April following the university graduation and they can characteristically work for years before retirement.
e) In his argument Mroczkowski (1998, p. 298) points to this life span employment method makes it plausible that a firm will profit from its venture in training, and also enables the organization to increase long term strategy for teaching the recruits. The administration training is founded on ordinary alternation through an extensive variety of a organization's functions and the recruits also regularly start their professions as average employees on a assembly line. Example: Mroczkowski says that (1998, p. 298) the model of customary alternation makes possible for the managers to increase a comprehensive perception of a quantity of diverse processes, which consequently over time achieves a rich general knowledge of the organization.
The article concludes by drawing out the implications of their progress for a number of areas of hypothetical consideration, as well as conception of implicit skills, flexible specialization, and self-sufficiency. In the World War II epoch, a great number of Japanese decision-making practices and cultural patterns happened to identified in a group as the Japanese organization system or Japanese administration technique.
References
Dirks, D 1999, ‘Japanese Management in the Low Growth Era’, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp-289
Harukiyo, H 1998, ‘Japanese Business Management’, London: Routledge, pp 123-377
Herbig, P 1997, ‘A Historical Perspective of Japanese Innovation’, Management Decision, September-October pp 199-207
McMillan, C 1996, ‘The Japanese Industrial System’, 3rd rev. ed. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp 199
Mroczkowski, T 1998, ‘The End of Japanese Management: How Soon?’ Human Resource Planning, September pp 298
Abernathy, W. J., K. B. Clark and A. M. Kantrow. 1981, ‘The new industrial competition’, Harvard Business Review (September-October): 68-81.
Abramovitch, I. 1994, ‘Beyond kaizen. Success’ (January/February): 85-88.
Ahmadjian, C 2001, ‘Safety in numbers: Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan’ Administrative Science Quarterly 46(4): 622-654.
Akao, Y. 1991, ‘Hoshin Kanri: Policy Deployment for Successful’ TQM. Productivity Press.
Amar, A 1984 ‘Japanese production management - Just-in-time and total quality control: Review and critique.’ Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business (Summer): 55-59.
Arnold, W 1961, ‘Japanese management rates itself - An experiment in appraising’ "business efficiencies". The Journal of the Academy of Management 4(2): 144-148.
