Kant Philosophy: A Top-Quality Essay For Your Inspiration

For Kant, differentiation between synthetic and analytic knowledge, a priori and a posteriori knowledge are essential building blocks in philosophy. The knowledge or judgment is a priori synthetic if it comprises of pure reason. It is a truth that is applicable to the objects; no matter people have or do not have experience of the object. An example is the judgment, knowledge, or proposition that God exists. A Priori knowledge is based on the reason, and it is independent of all the experiences, and it is applied with strict universality. A Posteriori knowledge is based on experience, and is limited as well as uncertain in its application to particular cases. This difference, however, also mentions the difference that is considered in logic between contingent and necessary truths. However, a less familiar differentiation between analytic judgments and synthetic judgments is also made by Kant.
Analytical judgments comprises are the judgments clauses and knowledge is in judgments, and they are not effective for adding anything to concept of subject of an individual. Analytic judgments are logically explained as they are explicative, and they can be taken from the non-contradiction principle. Synthetic judgments are the judgments in which knowledge and predicates are completely different from the subjects. They have some actual connection externally to the concepts. However, synthetic judgments are informative, and they need justifications in accordance with some principle from outside source. according to Kant, in Analytic A Priori, Analytic means to analyse, and A Priori means knowledge from ideas, whereas Synthetic A Posteriori indicates knowledge from experience. Kant has also mentioned third kind of judgment, which is Synthetic A Priori. The rationalists have mentioned that it is possible to know about the things certainly. The empiricists are of the view that knowledge cannot be restricted to truths. But, in Kant’s view there is no knowledge without sensation. But, it is also a fact that alone sense knowledge is not effective enough for providing knowledge.
Kant is of the view that sense experience as a final source of knowledge, and sense experience if considered alone does not indicate anything. Knowledge considers ordering and experience concepts of mind. He mentioned about the limits of knowledge, and explained that the limit of knowledge is as long as our mind is capable of proving the existence, and our senses are capable of perceiving. However, the world with we are familiar is already organized according to certain fixed and innate pattern of mind. Knowledge is possible as it is about the things regarding how they appear in front of us, and is not about the things how they are in themselves. Reason, however, provides the form and structure regarding what we know, and the senses facilitate us with content. Further, Knat mentioned that mind plays its role in imposing its categories on the experience data. He also mentioned that we are not familiar with the reality in itself, rather we know what is it is to me. The mind organizes the raw data of experience in accordance with the categories of time, space, and causality. They are, however, not true of things in itself, which is indicative of external reality. This enables individuals to have certainty about the things.
Hence, by statement knowledge is synthetic a priori Kant means that statements with which we are familiar are synthetic or posteriori, and all the synthetic statement are not known via experience, some of the synthetic statements are known A priori.