The process that I have been undertaking in writing the two texts is that of assessing the text that the author has with the audience. Rhetoric analysis is the process of analyzing text and getting the point of view of the author and trying to assess the gaps that are found in the text. This process helps the readers understand the subject that is being analyzed even better. It brings out the issues that are missing and, in the process, makes the understanding of the text clearer. This process is important in understanding the text that is under review. It is an important process in writing and literature review.
I was doing this process so that I would get an understanding of the text and also to know what the author was doing. This is an important process that should be undertaken when one wants to understand the text more. When analyzing a piece of text, it is important to understand how that text in view of the author. This process will also help in aiding other authors who might want to improve the text in future. The text could not be properly aligned with the current trends of the issue that is being handled by the author. The issue could have changed due to changes in technology; this will be a chance look at these issues.
The process of undertaking a rhetoric analysis helps to understand the end product. The end product was a better text that met the intention of the audience and the expectations of the audience. The gaps that were there in the text were sealed. The notion that the author wanted to address the literature students alone was negated. Kantz would have addressed all practitioners of literature, be they, students or tutors. This gap was sealed, and the text can now be used by everyone who has an interest in rhetorical analysis. The end product was also better in terms of in tandem with the expectations of the audience. The audience can now better relate with the author because the facts and the real intentions of the author are now brought into a clearer perspectives. The use of an imaginary character by the author to bring some things clearer is now emphasized in that the author could have used a real character than make an imaginary character. This way, the future authors who would like to edit the work will find it relevant and use the comments that I have suggested.
I have learnt that when writing a piece of literature, the intention and the structure could be wrong. I have always thought that all text and literature are perfect. I have also learning that all text and piece of literature should be read with a critical mind. This will enable us to understand the intentions of the author and see where we can help improve on the text. It helps have our own contributions and make the text come out clearer.
With rhetorical analysis, I have managed to put the author in kind when I am undertaking any form of writing. I value the readers and audience which the text is intended to address. I value their views and how they will view the text that I am writing. My thinking has been improved as I have managed to be critical and try to get any weakness and analysis and the intention of the author in anything I read. I have managed to look through text deeply.
