The concept of learned helplessness is ultimately a condition in which the specified animal or a human being learns to behave in a particular manner that is unique from the others. The character trait that a person learns becomes mutually embedded in ones behaviour hence becomes helpless in the context of trying to avoid over the same. A person learns with time to appreciate the positive rewards from the behaviour and clings to it.
The condition arises when a person is continuously subjected in an aversive stimulus. The stimulus should be in the overview that one cannot escape from the quagmire hence an individual behaves in that specified manner always. Eventually, the person will bring to a standstill the concept of trying to stay away from the incentive and act as if it is completely vulnerable to revolutionize the state of affairs. Even when opportunities to get away are offered, this erudite defencelessness will put off any accomplishment. The concept of helplessness becomes completely tied up to the person’s behaviour and the psychological reasoning. this goes a long sway in the effective determination of the person’s fair reasoning in terms of making rational decisions. And in addition the context of one controlling and managing ones environment. This functioning can lead people to fail to notice opportunities for assistance or change (Peterson 1989).
In this context of learned helplessness in does arise the various differences between human beings and the animals in terms of the behavioural change due to the shifted pattern of reasoning out various issues. Readily available are more than a few aspects of human helplessness so as to have no complement among animals. One of the most intriguing aspects is sensational erudition that folks can become skilled at to be helpless from side to side observing another person encountering unmanageable events (William$ Harkins 1979).
spaced out from the collective depression symptoms stuck between human and other animals such as tameness, interjected aggression, weight loss, desire for food loss, communal and sexual deficits, a number of of the investigative symptoms of learned helplessness inculcates other aspects such as dejected mood, feelings of worthlessness. This can be found and keenly observed in the context of human beings but not of necessity in other animals living in the surrounding environment.
In the article by Christopher Peterson it suggests that social loafing is generalized from one situation to another depending on the circumstance of the situation at hand. In this overview the idea of social loafing this is well connected to learned helplessness’s. This is because the idea of loafing is not related to in the category of problem solving issues (Peterson 1989).
The article further illustrates that through experience of the uncontrollable events, many people will learn to attain and at the same time expect the various diverse outcomes independent of their responses incurred in the various overviews of learned helplessness. This has been unjustified in the overview that they are metaphorical and an individual may base it solely in the context of passivity of one situation observed (latane $Williams 1977).
On the same note the authors further argues that the concept of learned helplessness can be a very crucial tool to be used to explain some failures of the human adjustment on that note. Also the careless application of the model in the social arena will ultimately obscure its value in the long run. Research further shows how an individual can become used to a specific phenomenon for the specific involvement in the learned helplessness (Zaccaro 1984).
The context of social loafing illustrates the decreased performance of an individual due to the context of the ultimate reduced effort. This phenomenon is observed in the context where an individual alienates oneself from the others and his/her efforts keenly observed as compared to when they are communally in a particular group. The context of social loafing further affects an individual morale in the context that when people are in a group they have a bargaining power and motivation to perform the various tasks together. A clear example is the concept of clapping while together (Seligman 1975).
Social loafing has further been linked to the concept of being addictive. This is in the overview that the contemporary allotment of the acquired learned helplessness when the rest of the group is not there the morale of an individual decreases. The concept of social loafing does occur due to the various issues such as lowering own efforts. Secondly is when the group increases and the lower goals are set by an individual. And thirdly the issue arises from the concept of obscuring the contingency from the learned helplessness (Peterson 1984).
On the context of the other article concerning test anxiety and learned helplessness, it clearly shows that anxiety causes cognitive elements in the behavioral framework of an individual which further contributes to the learned helplessness. This is well illustrated by the concerned that in the educational setup such as in the primary school children who exhibited helplessness failed in most of their exams. This was contributed by the anxiety that does develop in their study patterns (Baltas 1993).
The articles relate in the context that seeks to explore the various learned helplessness that the individuals do attain, which affects their performances in the various occasions.
In the above question presented about the pronunciation of the word CINERAMA to AMERICA by the three groups of individuals clearly brings out the concept of the influence of the attained learned helplessness. This is because those in the moderate and hard groups are impacted by the learned helplessness. The context well reflected is that due to the past failure of these individuals to perform. In the tasks presented before them will effectively discourage them to partake part in the later tasks. This in the context that these people would have a strong sense of self-efficacy and which leads to the lack of motivation to indulge into another (Morris 2002).
The concept of study limited poses to be a menace in the learned helplessness. This is because an individual becomes into a helpless situation that one cannot imagine being in the situation of understanding the concepts communicated hence retract from learning.
In this context of the above hypothesis highlighted the anagrams were correctly solved. This is because the depression exhibited by the concern that the individuals who are affected by the learned helplessness get discouraged in the process of trying the process all over again. The experiment showed significant differences between the easy, moderate and hard groups. This is a clear reflection that for those who are confident and can keenly handle the subject, in this case arranging the letters to make a new name were able to solve more anagrams in the exercise than the others.
References
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death.
Peterson, C. (1982). Learned helplessness and health psychology.
Garber, J., & Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds.). (1980). Human helplessness.
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. Williams, K., & Latan,(1977). The effects of group size on cognitive
Effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Williams, K., Harkins, S. & Latan (1981). Ldentifiability as deterrent to social loafing:
