LSI-R And Oasys Diagnostic Techniques in a Criminal Case
The expansion of the operational convict reentry system is among the most dangerous encounters that correction facilities face in the 21st century. To tackle the need for enhanced services, greater prominence has been employed concerning the application of practices that are evidence-based and, precisely, the application of risk and requirements valuations to monitor programming and planning of case for criminals whether in the prison or going back to the society. The contemporary inclination is to use fair, actuarial valuations instead of depending on perception, common sense or preference to enlighten behavior and management approaches. This paper looks into LSI-R and OASys diagnostic technique most appropriate for use in the case of Mr. Andrews. It gives details on the advantage the preferred method has over the other.
The LSI-R, an extensively accepted psychometric instrument embedded in the central principles of effective participation, risk, want and responsivity, will be best suited for Mr. Andrew’s case. This technique is repeatedly used to evaluate criminal risk for recid and necessity through numerous correctional backgrounds (James, 2015). The LSI-R is influential in categorizing offenders and supporting correctional team in observing and managing offenders. A risk and needs evaluation instrument evaluates the crooks’ criminal risk levels and precise essentials that if looked into will diminish the possibility of impending criminal action.
There are three major reasons why I feel that the LSI-R techniques are the most appropriate. First, it has 54 objects for contemplation. The objects are distributed into ten smaller subscales that evaluate the wrongdoer’s criminal past, training/ employment, savings, marital situations, accommodation, freedom and refreshment, acquaintances, drug complications, emotional matters, and assertiveness/ positioning. Andrew is involved in assault incidences, which is best addressed within these sun-groups. Second, the above objects are focused on danger, requisite and responsivity philosophies, which encourage service provision and assist the correctional team in the assortment of prison involvements known to decrease reoffending. Third, by recognizing the dynamic aspects most prognostic of Andrew committing the same crimes again, the appropriate use of such valuations can eventually function as a guide for the progress of individual case organization strategies for criminals going back to the community or be evaluated to a different location.
Although the Offender Assessment System technique also measures the risks and wants of illegal lawbreakers, it would be inadequate in handling the above case. This is because OASys encompasses a sequence of computer-grounded methods on which medical assessments are prepared by the team of Offenders for criminals in the society, and less regularly for offenders in prison (Moore, 2015). Since Mr. Andrew is already detained, applying such technique may now work.
When assessing the risk level, the total number of checked items on LSI-R provides a total score, the higher the score, the greater the risk of criminal behavior. Having had incidences of disorderly conduct, attack on a fellow convict, and not adhering to corrections officer instructions, the risk level of Andrew would be high. The threat principle claims that high-risk criminals require being located in programs that deliver additional rigorous conduct and amenities while low-risk offenders should receive minimally or even no intervention. Medium security facility would therefore not be the ideal option for Mr. Andrew’s incarceration.
Whereas the appropriate valuation and identification of a criminal’s level of risk and wants produce significant evidence, it is the manner in which this information is used that is best valued. The use of consistent assessments to cultivate case strategies for the criminal, comprising assignment in services and supervision levels, is a primary foundation of worth in the application of risk and needs valuations. In Andrew’s case, such tool would be the LSI-R technique.
References
James, N. (2015). Risk and Needs Assessment in the Criminal Justice System . London: Congressional Research Service.
Moore, R. (2015). A compendium of research and analysison the Offender Assessment System (OASys) . New York: Crown copyright .
