This article does not seem to be credible enough to be used as a source for an argumentative essay. The article is informally written, which explains why there are many grammatical errors. There are also no citations for the discussed information. Background information about the author is not included, making it difficult to determine his credibility. The paper where the essay is posted is also not included among the list of credible magazines and journals, thereby making it less credible. Although the article can still be considered up-to-date, considering that it was published just two years ago, the information discussed are heavily influenced by the author’s emotions and prejudice.
- Time to Enact “Do Not Track”
The editorial presents several facts about Facebook, but the sources where they come from are not cited. This makes it a less credible source for an argumentative essay. As it is an editorial for a famous newspaper, the author may be considered a credible writer regarding the topic. It is also for this reason that most of the discussion, despite being based on some sources, contains opinion of the author, thereby making it less objective. On a positive note, the editorial is up-to-date as it was posted just a couple of years ago.
- How Sticky is Membership on Facebook? Just Try Breaking Free
The article appeared on New York Times, which gives it and the author credibilty. It is also worth considering where each of the information discussed are cited as this provides accuracy to the article. Since the sources are all cited, the author’s bias is also lessened, and those which are apparent are supported by facts provided by the sources.However, among the three sources, it is the oldest, but not old enough for it to be considered outdated.
Argument Plan
Position statement:
Moderating media violence is a more feasible solution than completely eradicating it.
Rhetorical context analysis:
With the current trend in technology development, people are exposed to media far longer than before. It is for this reason that media violence poses an urgent issue in the development of aggressiveness among children. As such, a paper that will encourage awareness and participation from stakeholders is necessary in order to help those who are already influenced, as well as prevent influencing those who are exposed in media violence.
Audience analysis:
Considering that the paper is about media violence, it aims to target young children who are easily influenced by media violence. Similarly, parents who are in charge of teaching and disciplining their children are also target audience of the paper. Psychologists and other medical personnel involve in treating children who exhibit aggressive behavior as a result of exposure in media violence are also included, as well as target audience of the paper.
A claim:
Considering the significant number of studies about media violence and its effects on children’s behavior, and the apparent lack of actions taken as initiated by parents and/or medical practitioners in order to lessen if not eradicate them, it is a more feasible goal to regulate media violence rather than completely eliminate it.
Thesis: Moderating violence in media is a more feasible course of action rather than completely eliminating it.
- Introduction: Media violence is the depiction of violence in media sources which may have long-term negative effects on the youth and the society.
- Violence is portrayed on TV and radio shows, movies, and comic books.
- Researches show that exposure to media violence develops aggressive behaviors among children and young adolescents.
- Despite the proven effects, media violence still persists.
- Body 1: Media is widespread, which makes monitoring it difficult.
- Television is where violence is most rampant.
- The arrival of new media channels such as music videos, video games, and the Internet prove that media is expanding rapidly and powerfully.
- Children spend more time on media everyday than any other activities.
- Body 2: Banning or completely eliminating violence in media is being opposed by adults who are old enough to choose what they want to see in media.
- People of legal age agree that violence in media may have some negative effects on children.
- Parents and guardians should monitor and put restrictions on children instead of banning violence in media.
- Although studies have been made over the years, it appears that they all fail to establish strong arguments of its negative effects on minors.
- Body 3: Other factors that may have influences on the development of aggressive behaviors among children should be studied.
- Researches show a weak relationship between media violence and children’s aggressive behavior.
- Studies show that relationships at home and in school, bad neighborhoods or poverty also influence the development of aggressive behavior among children.
- Mental health conditions of the children cause aggressive behavior, among others.
- Conclusion: Media violence affects children, and tempering it instead of eliminating or banning it is a more sound solution.
- Parents, medical practitioners and the society should take active participation in educating children about media and its possible effects on them.
- Further studies should be taken to determine more possible solutions.
- What social issues interest or concern you?
- The ethical issues involved in buying counterfeit designer products
- Privacy issues in Facebook and other networking sites
- Choose one that you you’d like to focus on for this essay and write it below.
The ethical issues involved in buying counterfeit designer products
- What is the rhetorical context surrounding this issue, i.e., why is it important to you and how is it prevalent in
today’s society?With the bad economic condition of many countries in the world today, buying counterfeit products presents a problem in a nation’s effort to improve its economic situation. It is therefore important to study and analyze the issues, particularly the ethical issues involve in buying counterfeit merchandise.
- List some of the things that you already know about your topic.
- The exorbitant amount that comes with authentic designer products influence people to buy counterfeit merchandise
- Because of this, many countries are inversting in producing counterfeit products
- Supporting counterfeit products causes a decline in sales of designer merchandise, thereby affecting the country’s economy
- What is your opinion on the topic?
Producing and supporting counterfeit products should be given more attention as not only does it present problems in the economy, but involves certain ethical issues
- List some of the questions that you have about this issue.
- How is it possible for countries to produce and export counterfeit products?
- What are the current laws about production, exportation and selling of counterfeit products?
- How much does selling counterfeit products affect a country’s economy?
- List some of the different perspectives that exist on this issue.
- People who can’t afford to buy authentic designer products also have the right and should have the option to buy such products even if they are counterfeit.
- Authentic designer products should not be as expensive as they are being sold these days.
- Where do you think you will be able to find good sources on this topic?
- Journals c. Magazines
- Books
