Introduction
There are numerous diverse models used to clarify the nature and treatment of mental illness. This paper will compare and contrast biological and psychodynamic models of abnormality. The biological model recommends that abnormal conduct be brought about by biological elements, particularly including hereditary material and the brain. The brain consists of billions of neurons (nerve cells) that get and transmit data. The brain is isolated into two halves of the globe, each one controlling the inverse side of the body. The brain structures most applicable to abnormal conduct incorporate the thalamus, hypothalamus, reticular enacting framework, limbic framework, and cerebrum. Different structures in the midbrain and hindbrain produce chemicals that are corresponded with a mental issue (Davies, 2008)
Psychodynamic models accentuate early youth encounters. Nervousness results from oblivious clashes and undermines people; in managing those dangers, people create manifestations. Psychoanalysis is the helpful strategy that affirms oblivious clashes must be broadcast and saw by the patient to take out abnormal conduct (Peterson, 2010).
Comparison between biological and psychodynamic models of abnormality
There exist several differences between the two models. The vital hypothesis of biological model is that it bears a resemblance to physical illnesses while the key hypothesis of this psychodynamic model is that the origins of mental disorders are psychological. The biological classical takes on more of a medical view, which is slightly self-explanatory by the name while psychodynamic classical states that somebody's conduct is the consequence of causal dynamic psychological forces, whether they are autonomous or interactive. The key focus of the biological approach is the brain and how psychological abnormality shoots from malfunctioning parts of the animal unlike psychodynamic model, which suggests that it is an unconscious fight between three forces: the id, self, and superego. The biological model recommends that the abnormal behavior be triggered by biological factors while psychodynamic model stresses early childhood skills.
These model have few similarities. They can both be treated and they present an absence of scientific sign concerning major theoretical norms.
In my opinion I believe biological model is more powerful compared to psychodynamic model since it uses natural and diverse methods to detect mental illnesses. It dwells on biological agents rather other external factor hence easy to deploy and implement.
References
Davies, D., & Bhugra, D. (2004). Models of psychopathology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Peterson, C. (2010). The psychology of abnormality. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
