Question 1:
When Aristotle is confronted with the philosophical question of what is superior between the scientific knowledge and religious knowledge, it presents the notion of context. It is obvious that some line of thought would be skewed and directed towards believing that scientific knowledge is superior. Like Newton, I am of the opinion that the religion and the notion and concept of God is a fallacy, or at best I would describe it as a hypothesis (Trompf, 93). Thus, the knowledge of nature and science stands to be out rightly superior to the rules of religion or God by extension.
Question 2:
This inquiry seems to establish if there is a functional relationship in a particular order in terms of superiority. In retrospect, this is an inquiry on whether one kind of knowledge is better than others. Scientific knowledge seems to show and establish how sense is made, while religion is based on faith and belief (Demps, 420). For instance, it is indisputable that the religion explain how the universe and gravity were created by God, but it does not explain how the dynamics of gravity essentially work. It is to say that it does not explain how gravity, for instance, works.
Question 3:
As Newton I would put forth the notion and argument of the chronology of knowledge, I suggest that all of knowledge ought to be informed through a theory. Any ratified knowledge must be based on a theory-which is to say that there must be a reasonable explanation and reasons that can explain them.
Question 4:
God stands to be the outright owner of all knowledge and information in the world. The above stems from the fact that God is the creator of the universe and the entire thing that originates in it. The fact that God was the original creator of the universe implies that all the things that are in it including knowledge were created by Him.
Work cited
Dempsey, Liam. "Written in the flesh: Isaac Newton on the mind–body relation." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37.3 (2006): 420-441.
Trompf, Garry W. "Isaac Newton and the Kabbalistic Noah: natural law between Mediaeval and the Enlightenment." Aries 15 (2005): 91-118.
