(Professor/Instructor)
(Course/Major)
Reflection on HCP
In striving to revise an HCP on the Three Strikes Law, several questions come to mind, and in the course of the assessment, develop questions that are relevant to the revision of the HCP. In addition, one must also look to identify possible areas that can be strengthened or expounded further for the readers to gain a better grasp of the issues attendant to the subject at hand. (Comments a1 to a4) In the former action, that of establishing questions that can be framed sans an intensive examination of the paper, one can ask the questions such as “have the issues been dealt with adequately?” “Are the issues expounded or explained enough for the reader to accurately gage the scope of the issue?” Another question can be whether the information was sufficient in presenting the case. All these questions serve as a template to the work to be done in the paper. In the case of the Three Strikes Law, the quality of the research must be vetted and then compared if the event is also occurring in other jurisdictions. (The research shows the acceptability of the punishment in the US criminal justice system).
Nonetheless, these are template questions, meaning that there can be additional questions integrated into the assessment, or in the operation of the evaluation, points that have been thoroughly assessed and can be over discussed to the point that these can be redundant to the discussion. At this point, the examination of the paper can begin; here, the questions that must be developed include “were the points in the paper strong enough to convey the message; if not, what is missing from the discussion?” Other questions that can be engaged are “was the issue narrowed down sufficiently to center on a core objective/ concern for discussion?” Another issue is whether the concerns are aided by sufficient facts and data. Here, these questions can be helpful aids in assessing the contents of the HCP for tyihs issue.
There is no need to discuss Amendments as law papers are already adept with the language and applicability of the provision to the case.
Unless indicated, the sources in the paragraph are the source for that section of the paper.
It is rarely done that the works of the sources in the paper have to be established. Very rarely as well is that academics do not know sources in the subject.
It is important to study a subject as it applies to a general population and not ‘in a fish bowl.’ This means, there must be a basis as to why California considered such a law, and in this context, the other states had such a law.
