The Ideas and Beliefs of Recent times
Organizational Leadership: the Ideas and Beliefs of Recent times
According to general view, leadership is the behavior or trait of a leader who leads a people, a group of people or even an organization. On the other hand, some people think that leadership is the best and only way to improve their social, professional and personal life .
1 Different archetypes of leadership
There are five archetypes of leadership . They are-
- Aversive Leadership- The major type of leader impact followed by most of the leaders is through making use of unsympathetic and apathetic means such as abuse, scolding, and coercion. Aversive leadership mostly gives emphasis on their subordinates’ poor effort and mistaken or intolerable behaviors.
- Directive Leadership- Directive leadership characterizes a typical superior who interacts with the subordinates in an extremely dictating manner. Depending on their official superior position in the group; directive leaders take decisions, commands different assignments and orders, and apprehend that his followers will carry out all his orders in a dedicated manner.
- Transactional Leadership- This type of leadership highlights the creation and clarification of providing rewards and contingencies to the juniors. Transactional leaders get themselves involved in exchanging interactions with his juniors by assigning and tactically awarding rewards in return for achieving the goals successfully. This type of leadership is basically constructed on a balanced exchange of association between the leader and his subordinate.
- Transformational Leadership-The leaders who follow the method of transformational leadership leads his subordinates by stimulating the inner sense and power and inspiring them. These types of leaders generally generate extremely fascinating and encouraging ideas that helps to increase the performance. Transformational leaders apply attitudes such as magnetism and knowledgeable motivation to encourage performance of juniors that enhance their performance far better than what is expected. Transformational leaders create a dream for himself and his subordinates and inspire the followers to do their best for achieving this dream. They generally encourage the followers also to experiment the current situation to dedicate completely to chase that dream and goal.
- Empowering Leadership- this type of leadership signifies an important model shift and gives emphasis to the self-influence of the followers rather than outward and influences that are top-down. Leaders who make use of empowering behaviors have confidence in the fact that followers are a significant basis of insight and way. The leaders following empowering leadership highlight self-control, self-influence and self-management. If empowering leadership is followed perfectly, then it helps to produce effective self-leader followers, who in turn gets involved in evolving activities and specialized thought processes that is generally used by us to manipulate our own behavior.
2 What is organizational leadership?
Basically organizational leadership is an individual behavior of a leader that is unrestricted, not directly or clearly acknowledged by the popular and recognized reward system yet that in overall stimulates the enhanced productivity of the organization .
According to the literary definition organizational leadership does not include rewards formally after completion of any vision of the leader. But in practice this type of leadership includes affectionate behavior to the subordinates that includes lending a helping hand to the juniors in case of high work pressure, helping the newcomers become adjusted in the new organization and new ambience and many more. According to literary explanation this type of leadership does include rewards formally hence it is usually measured as extra-role behavior. Undeniably, in many circumstances it is seen to provide an essence of proper teamwork which ultimately increases the output.
Team members under a leader who believes in organizational leadership can ultimately develop the performance of his team to the desired target of the organization. They can continuously grease the machine of work process that rotates each day but never fails to produce proper outputs .
4 Relation between strategic thinking, strategic planning and organizational leadership
Creating exact definition of strategic thinking and strategic planning are still under process in academic literature. What is lacking still now is the hypothetical basis for the strategic thinking proficiency. The scholars of the entire world have somehow taken the initiative for making out the exact work of strategic thinking with relation to its definition. What they try to do is to discriminate out-dated strategic planning from the other general concepts of strategic thinking.
While strategic planning is focused in an upward curve, observing and making sure how strategies get hooked up with corporate targets and strategies, strategic thinking is completely different. It is downwardly attentive, looking to make sure that sense and motivation are spread all over the organization. It helps to develop and meet the exact needs of the organization and to fulfill the ultimate target and goal to increase revenue. To say in general terms, Strategic planning in a broader sense is further related to the work of classical management. On the other hand strategic thinking is highly linked to the work of organizational leadership .
Plans generally get changed regularly. But the overall goals, actions and tactics change every so often that are subjected to change only in case of any internal or external environmental conditions that provoke the change. The objective of Strategic Thinking is to always uphold a general sense of reliability of drive and direction in the midst of the fluctuations of corporate requirements. This is accomplished by concentrating on the Morals, Missions and Ideas of the organization only. It generally eliminates the minor order purposes and actions. To describe in different verse, strategic thinking is all about upholding the essential order in the midst of the superficial disorders or confusions of organizational life.
Leaders of an organization never get an opportunity and luxury of scheduling and planning in terms of one perspective and one sector. Leaders of an organization need to take care of all the staffs, clienteles, Board of Directors, various funding and subsidy sources. Not only the different sectors in the office, but they also need to take care of their own individual customers and assignments. Although taking preparation for numerous areas may lead to variances in the behavior of a leader. The hardest and most important undertaking that a leader always faces is getting the approval from different groups of people to any certain long-standing objective of the organization. This job is so difficult that it can alone produce variations in how different leaders will behave in different organizations.
If any leader lacks any sort of daily positive communication with her or his employees, or the human side of the entire job, then the other characteristics of a leader’s duties will also undoubtedly suffer. In one sentence it can be said that Leadership is a simple both-sided commitment and association between the leaders and his employees to accomplish a common aim of the organization. This commitment stimulates leaders to take control of their employees’ behavior, in the same time controlling their employees’ insights also. This creates an expectation of suitable behavior that becomes deep-rooted in the organizational ambience in long-term.
In several situations, efficient leaders retain both, a worry about whether the task will be successful as well as creating an individual rapport with the employees. This is because there is a comparative direct linking between employees, their efficiency, and the organization’s production, it is vital for all the leaders of all the organizations to sustain a positive work culture and work ambience in office to make best use of the efficiency of the employees and enhance their energies to reach organizational supreme output. A leader’s behavior alone can explain that nearly in 25 percent cases the employees show high productivity in office, feel encouraged, energized, and highly operative and dedicated in their workstations .
5 Conclusion
Organizational leadership and efficiency can only accurately be taken into account if we give emphasis on both computable methods of success of activities correctly related to each other to accomplish significant goals and also the qualitative methods intrinsic to the organization’s perception of ethics, motivation, and vision and sense. Strategic thinking, strategic planning and good organizational leadership occur most notably at the later stages and then perform rigid to connect the organizational passion to a frame that is correctly suitable to stay together by the managers and planners of the organization. Such acknowledgment of different perceptions of stratagem is crucial for government managers who require dealing with the managing of funds and carrying out proper services.
Works Cited
Bennis, W. (2009). On Becoming a Leader. Philadelphia: Perseus Book Group.
Fairholm, M. R. (2009). Leadership and Organizational Strategy. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal , 14 (1).
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice Fifthe Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Yun, S., Cox, J., & Sims Jr., H. P. (2007). Leadership and Teamwork: The Effects of Leadership and Job Satisfaction on Team Citizenship. International Journal of Leadership Studies , 2 (3), 171-193.
