Perfect Model Essay On Ethical Issues In Erin Brockovich

Erin Brockovich is a film centered on the real-life story of Brockovich herself. The movie conveys various ethical issues. Brockovich is a single mother who struggles hard to make a living. Due to a car accident, she gained access and became part of a law firm where she worked as a clerk. Her interest was focused on examining medical cases. With the permission of Ed Masry, Brockovich started to search for links between the Hinkley, CA community members and the Pacific Gas and Electric Co (PG&E). The company has a factory in Hinkley. The factory has been pointed as the cause of the occurrence of many health concerns in the community including miscarriages, headaches, and cancer.
Brockovich is not a lawyer but through her tenacity, she started to uncover a lot of details about the case, including the hexavalent chromium present in the water and the different health issues in the community. When PG&E found out that the law firm where Brockovich works is conducting an investigation concerning their usage of hexavalent chromium, the company attempted to work on stopping the investigation. A representative of PG&E worked on buying out the Jensen family, one of the many families impacted by sickness, and Annabell, the young daughter, who struggles with cancer. The representative tried to offer $250,000 but asserts positively no obligation regarding any medical conditions and would not pay any restorative costs. This agent is a relentless individual who refuses to assume liability for the harm his organization has brought on to families in the Hinkley community. Another employee from the company threatened the safety of Brockovich and her family because the company knew that Brockovich possesses important data that could demonstrate their shortcoming in the wellbeing issues of Hinkley group of individuals.
The essential business morals issues that were depicted include deception, environmental damage, bribery, and the powerlessness to trust organizations. These moral business issues were centered on PG&E and their representatives. It appears that these people did anything to survive in desperation, including a worker who continued to clean the tanks while having nose bleeds. PG&E was uncaring; else they would have changed their arrangements to stop the utilization of unsafe chemicals. Charles Embry was an exception in this case. He was an employee at PG&E who, toward the final stretch of the investigation, surrendered the evidence that PG&E had asked him to destroy. Embry was aware how unethical it was to abolish the proof of harmful chemicals. Embry had some members of his family suffered and died due to the harmful chemicals. Hence, he was more than willing to go at any length to do what is right for the greater good.
Deception was one of the essential topics in the motion picture. PG&E tried to deceive the whole town of Hinkley by permitting them to trust that their water source was protected. The film depicted how PG&E conducted a meeting which was attended by 200 individuals from Hinkley to clarify the advantages of PG&E utilizing chromium three at their plant when in reality, the company was utilizing hexavalent chromium which is exceedingly harmful to the environment and people’s health.
The second moral problem in the film is bribery. Two best case of bribery in the movie is the point at which the organization endeavored to pay the group just to drop every one of the charges and claim that the health issues they're encountering were not created by PG&E. This was obviously depicted to be an unethical move and was determined rapidly through Brockovich's choice, alongside the Jensen's, not to acknowledge the reward. It was an offending pay off from their point of view, and PG&E must not have endeavored to utilize pay off in any case. PG&E paid off these individuals to go to a particular specialist by paying for the visit, where the specialist let them know all that their health issues were entirely inconsequential to the chromium utilized at PG&E plants. This is a hugely illegal conduct as it intensifies the negative parts of deception, bribery, as well as dishonesty.
Ultimately, the issue of damaging the earth was apparently represented as a third moral quandary. This hexavalent chromium was plainly exceptionally perilous to people, and it was additionally incredibly destructive to the environment particularly the water framework. PG&E was depicted in a negative light by and by because this organization did not appear to think about sustainability at all. PG&E did not authorize arrangements to keep the water safe, and in this manner traded off the eventual fate of Hinkley by tainting the water. In the film, PG&E avoided the progression of adding the liner to the pools at their plant to keep the stream off water safe. This unmistakably was unsafe to the earth and gambled sustainability.
PG&E could have determined these moral issues effortlessly. In any case, the organization continued their way of dishonest conduct which they paid for over the long haul. In fact it is troublesome for representatives to act against their organization; in any case, this activity outlined precisely that it is so imperative to act in a moral way, regardless of the possibility that your organization is untrustworthy.