Plato believed that violence, suicide and death penalty is not justifiable at all. However he does not believe in following someone else’s thoughts and he believes on philosophical awareness by either forcefully or ideologically. Highlighting the importance of philosophical awareness the text suggests that the philosophical experts are the main ones who know the worth and prevalence of hypothetical life. The rest will just like their endeavors once they are fruitful. This is an exertion from Plato to legitimize the utilization of energy. Standard individuals won't strive independently or voluntarily towards a hypothetical life on the grounds that they don't comprehend the estimation of such a life. They must be constrained (e.g. instructed, directed and so forth.). An enthusiastic and realist lifestyle must be disallowed. The pioneers should not take after the cravings of the individuals as they do in a vote based system – yet despite what might be expected smother these goals.
Moreover Plato’s text Apology suggests that individuals must be pressured. They must be taught the estimation of hypothetical life. Their acumen must be empowered, and their enthusiasms directed. Control is in this manner imperative. Craftsmanship which fortifies the energies and cravings must be restricted. Symbolization must be levelheaded rather than passionate. Plato did not like the craft and mythology of his time, in light of the fact that they portrayed the divine beings with the same weaknesses as man. Craft must give the right illustration.
He says in Apology, while replying to the charges against him and to the first accusers, that his accusers have accused him for a very long time. He also says that Anytus and his companions are dangerous and he is afraid of them. Plato also believes that far more dangerous than Anytus are these, who were fed lies since their childhood about the wise man Socrates. He says that he fears these accusers the most because they circulate this rumor more passionately. Plato condemns those who are behind the propaganda against Socrates and him. Among their critics, there were those who wished Plato and Socrates dead. While Socrates did not fear death, even in his trial when he was facing death sentence, they both condemned violence against anyone to prove a point. Plato, in apology, displayed his dismay over the fact that people are bent on killing and not in engaging in logical debate.
Nonetheless, Plato needed to keep away from physical power. He accepts that truth is superior to drive and additionally superior to influence focused around conclusions and argumentation. Plainly obvious truth constrains the brain to acknowledge it, however this energy is truly unique in relation to physical power and it is more powerful than conclusions focused around contentions. In any case, this is as of now an exceptionally brutal type of instruction. Additionally, not everyone is sufficient material for the creation of a scholar. What happens with those individuals who end up being sort of not the same as the arrangement?
The best that can befall them is hard train; the most noticeably bad is end. The Platonic perfect is a general public of individuals who lead a reasoning life, who know the everlasting truths and dismissal the evolving appearances, the yearnings of the body and the cycles of common need. Anyhow it is not equitable to constrain one vision of the great life on all subjects. In a popular government, individuals must be allowed to pick their own particular great life. On the off chance that is constrained to lead a specific sort of life, regardless of the fact that it is for their own particular great and that later they will thank for it.
Furthermore the above text sheds some light on the fact that Plato accepts that the force of speculation can defeat the body and that this force might be produced and prepared. Each individual has the force of speculation and the ability to create this force in such a path, to the point that it is effectively adjusted with different powers, for example, feelings, aspirations and so on.
Towards the end of the texts it appears as if Plato concedes that this preparation and order might once in a while be unsuccessful. The brain will be unable to addition a position of prevalence with respect over other, all the more real personnel and cravings. Some individuals will never be solid enough to battle the monster in them, not even with compelling train in a domineering state headed by savants with an iron hand. The person, who, in the eyes of Plato, was the best ace of the mammoth in himself and consequently the sample to all of us, was Socrates. With the help of such texts and ideologies, Plato emphasizes declining to escape in the wake of having been sentenced to death, he demonstrated to the undisciplined democrats, all the proper methodologies to live past yearning, a definitive longing being the wish to live.
Conclusion:
Plato has had a more prominent impact over human thought than any viable individual with the conceivable exemption of Aristotle; this is expected both to the natural essentialness of his thoughts and to the way that he shows up at a relatively early stage in Western society. A logician in our day is viewed as an authority in a field of information different from that of science. Plato was a rationalist in a completely diverse sense. For him, philosophy was about understanding into the entire of truth, the investigation of actuality in all its perspectives. However Plato needed to keep away from physical power. He accepts that truth is superior to drive and additionally superior to influence focused around conclusions and argumentation. Plainly obvious truth constrains the brain to acknowledge it, however this energy is truly unique in relation to physical power and it is more powerful than conclusions focused around contentions.
In any case, this is as of now an exceptionally brutal type of instruction. Plato condemned violence just as Socrates did. There is no way violence can be justified in the eyes of Plato, as he always was the lawyer of logic and peace. In the perfect Platonic culture, headed by speculation individuals who use power to prepare others to get like them, there will be wellbeing on the grounds that profound life, free from the subjection of nature and cravings, is the main great life. It implies flexibility, the fulfillment of learning, and peace in light of the fact that the goals and enthusiasms of individuals are the fundamental explanation behind strife. Likewise different purposes behind strife, for example, shortage, will be killed by an arranging state dealing with populace and conception prevention. The amount of residents will no more cause lack, envy, regional extension and different motivations to go to war.