Prediction of PCL-R Scores
Psychopathy is defined as a mental disorder that is normally characterised by an individual always carrying out his activities in a manner that is selfish and manipulative and they always lack remorse. In addition to this, they are always in most instances emotionally detached from the public in that, they are always anti-social and further have the callous-unemotional traits. It was further realised, that in cases that the an individual shows these traits, then he or she ends up not caring that much about the people around him or her.Over the years researchers have had in place various theses pertaining to the relationship between ADHD, sensation seeking and instant gratification. Further, various researchers have tried to see if these factors may further be used to predict the PCLR scores.
In the Stanford Marshmallow Test (1960) which was carried out by Walter Mischel was aimed at seeing how much self-control his subjects; hungry pre-schoolers, had by studying how many of them could wait for an extra 15-20 minutes to have the two marshmallows. From the findings it was clear that only a third of the subjects were able to delay gratification while the others opted for the one marshmallow. They were studied until they graduated High School. As expected, the Children who were able delay their gratification were more positive, more self-motivated and further they were able to act in a persistent manner with the view of achieving their goals. From this research, it may have been concluded that at times, one may be able to predict the PCL-R scores by looking at an individual’s traits before the test. This is since, from the study, it was shown that the children who sought instant gratification showed the psychopathic behavioural traits; troubled, indecisive and were unable to be successful inactivities that required them to act in a stealthy manner, for example, for them to achieve long-term goals.
In the Rogers Study (1997), that was tailored to prove that one has the ability of predicting how adolescents would score in their PCL-R test by him or her looking at their previous behaviours. The research was compared to the findings that were recorded from Hare (1961) study. Hare’s research showed that the adult offenders depicted various traits of psychopathy, for example, selfishness and they weren’t remorse and they tended to be anti-social in the ways they interacted with others in the society and furthermore, their lifestyle was one which tended not to be deviant in their lifestyle. Rodgers’ research was meant to prove that psychopathy was not only depicted by the individuals conduct disorder but extended to their sensation seeking to their grandiosity.
The research was carried out by taking various teenagers from different ethnic backgrounds and looked into their Conduct Disorder together with their Oppositional and Defiant Disorder. They then studied the subject’s previous antisocial behaviour and cross-checked it with the PCL-R records. The research findings were able to show that the male subjects, who depicted the psychopathic traits, as compared to their female counterparts. Further, the research was able to show that the subject’s ethnicity of the models were realised to be a factor that contributed to the traits, as they results were lower in the White subject as compared to the other races.
In Norman G Poythress (2001) research, which was aimed at showing the various predictors of psychopathy among the adolescents. In the research, the team was able to look into the various indicators of psychopathy; behaviour and looking into the hyperactive-impulsive attention problems looked together with the conduct disorder which in most instances are looked at as distinct indicators. . This research was able to show that when it comes to psychopathy, the only independent indicator was the behavioural indifferences whereas the other indicators were all dependant on the other indicators. In summary, the research proved the hypotheses that it is only the Conduct Disorder could be used to predict the PCL-R scores.
The various indicators of psychopathy were then again distinguished according to their characteristics. It was realised that the behavioural inhibition, was an indicator of primary psychopathy whereas the individual’s temperament caused the variation in the individual’s secondary psychopathy. The research findings went ahead to show that psychopathy was indicated more by the individual’s deviant lifestyle. In addition to this, the researchers were able to realize that in some instances, the potential indicators may not bear the desired results. This is since, it was realised inattention and impulsivity were components of ADHD. In addition to this, it was then realised that impulsivity was more related to psychopathy. This shows that in most instances, the impulsivity will in most cases amount to psychopathy which is seen via the deviant lifestyle features. So to sum up tis research, it was realised that Psychopathy and ADHD are correlated since by studying the individual’s ADHD the researchers will be able to predict how the subject’s PCL-R scores may turn out.
In the Eve Kimonis (2016) research was conducted with the aim of finding out whether Callous-Unemotional (CU) Traits could be measured in preschoolers, it was realised that the CU traits would be used to identify the students who were anti-social in the various researches. It was further realised, that these traits in the children led to anti-social behaviours while in adults led to criminal behaviours. In this research, it was realised that the children who depict these anti-social behaviours, mostly don’t end up being criminals when they grow up. However, the findings from the research prescribed that measures to contain this situation must be taken in the early stages of the child’s life. Further, this research showed that the emotional functioning of the students was a major determinant of how they will end up functioning in the future. This research was able to prove the hypotheses that a child’s early ICU traits may be indicators of how they may end up, the anti-social behaviour of the children can be reduced by the intervention of the parents and the teachers. In conclusion, this research was able to prove that child’s behaviour may be an indicator of the results if carried out even in the future.
In the Maria Daversa (2010) study, it was realised that in most cases the way the child act is always dependant on the way the child is treated at home. It was realised that the in cases that the child is physically and emotionally abused back at home, he or she will in most instances, show signs of psychopathy. Their actions may at times be led to the parent neglecting them.
The research carried out by the team was able to show that the children, who depicted the psychopathic traits, would in most instances not react to stimuli when the research is carried out. This lack of stimuli then was then used to show a link between childhood victimization and violent behaviour around their peers. In addition to this, high rates of victimization of the child were realised to be linked to substantially more violence and high PCL-R scores in adulthood whereas a frequent co-occurrence of low victimization in childhood was linked with later indications of none or minor violence and low adult PCL scores
In conclusion, the various researches that were carried out by the research teams were able to prove that, a child’s psychopathic traits may be able to be predicted by an individual looking at the persons previous way of life, in addition to this the researchers were able to p[rove the theory that a child who were victims of neglect from parents tend to end up being psychopaths and lastly the children who are antisocial in their childhood years tend to be psychopaths in when they grow up.
References
Casey, B. e. (2011). Behavioral and Neutral Correlates of Delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of teh National Academy of Sciences, 14998-15003.
Daversa, M. T. (2010). Early Environmental Predictors of the Affective and Interpersonal Constructs of Psychopathy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 6-22.
Eva R. Kimonis, K. A.-H. (2016). Can Callous-Unemotional Traits be Reliably Measured in Preschoolers. J Abnorm Child Psychol , 625-638.
Frick, P. J., & Ellis, M. (1999). Callous-unemotional traits and subtypes of conduct disorder. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2(3), 149–168
Hare, J. (1991). Manual for the revised psychopathy Checklist. Multi-Health Systems, 56-68.
Jeffrey D. Burke, R. L. (2007). Adolescent Conduct Disorder and Interpersonal Callousness as Predictors of Psychopathy in Young Adults. Journal ofClinical Child & adolescent Psychology, 334-345.
Janssen, E., Goodrich, D., Petrocelli, J., & Bancroft, J. (2009). Psychophysiological response patterns and risky sexual behavior inheterosexualandhomosexualmen.ArchivesofSexualBehavior, 38, 538–550.
Johanna Feilhauer, M. C.-J. (2012). Aggressive Behaviour. Differential Associations Between Psychopathy Dimensions, Types of Aggression, and Response Inhibition, 77-88
Lynam, D. R. (1997). Childhood psychopathy: Capturing the fledgling psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425-438..
Naser Aghababaei, S. M. (2014). comoarison of teh Dark Triad and Honesty-Humility in Prosciality, religiosity, and happiness. Personality and individual Differences, 6-10.
Pawel Lowicki, M. Z. (2015). No empathy for people nor God: The relationship between the dark triad and empathy. Personality and Individual differences, 1-4.
Power, T. J., Tresco, K. E., & Cassano, M. C. (2009). School-based interventions for students with ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 11, 407-414.
Poythress, N. G. (2001). Predictors of Adolescence Psychopathy. The Journal of the american Acdemy of Psychiatry and teh Law, 383-385.
Poythress, N. G. (2011). Psychopathy and Impulsivity recognised. Agression and Violent Behaviour, 120-134.
Richard Rogers, J. J. (1997). Predictors of Adolescent PPschopathy. Oppositional and Conduct-Disorderd Symptoms, 261-271.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
Samantha D. Price, R. T. (2013). Psychopathy and Depression as Predictors of Psychosocial Difficulties in a Sample of Court Evaluated Adolescents. American Psychological Association, 261-269.
Zapolski,T.C.B.,Cyders,M.A.,&Smith,G.T.(2009).Positiveurgency predicts illegal drug use and risky sexual behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 348–354.
