For Scenario 1, I would use project-based organizational structure where an independent team would be created to handle the northwest United States horn market. The reason for picking this structure is the focus on a single project where the selected team will just deal with this project thereby increasing chances of project success. The potential problem with this structure is the weakening of the integration between the parent organization and the project team. In addition, there is potential for duplication of efforts in case the organization has such project teams for many other projects.
For Scenario 2, I would want the matrix organizational structure to run the project. The matrix structure adds a level of project management structure to the functional hierarchical structure. My company would follow the functional hierarchical structure while the electrical, plumbing and heating/cooling team would be integrated as a project based structure. My reason for picking this structure is due to its ability to allow integration of work between different units. Potential problems might arise in failure of cooperation between the functional manager and the project manager.
Answers to scenario 1
I am more likely to have success as a project manager because I will be focused on a single project and managing the project team is much easier and more productive.
I would give my team an incentive where those who complete their tasks earlier and more efficiently get to enjoy some time off the project.
I would report to the functional line manager of Horns’R’Us.
Answers to Scenario 2
The project manager should be the one selected by the company.
The most important skill for the PM is ability to communicate with people at all levels.
In this situation, accountability is handled by PM and therefore, the laborer works and reports to the PM.
