[Enter Student’s Name]
[Enter Affiliation]
Rational Unified Process Model vs. Scrum Model
Compare and Contrast Rational Unified Process Model vs. Scrum Model:
Collaris and Dekker (2010) have mentioned that the Rational Unified Process Model is a process of software development from Rational, an IBM division whereas, Scrum model is an agile model of software development based on numerous small teams performing in an interdependent and intensive way. Both methodologies are regarded approach project and agile activities in iterative way. Both, rational unified process and scrum models, offer guidance on management of a team however, do not concentrate on project management. The scrum master supports the team to use and perceive cross-functionality and self-management whereas the rational unified process model create self-managed teams and collaborate across teams. Every member of the Scrum team uses her or his expertise where the resulting cooperation develops the quality of code and increases productivity. Similarly, rational unified process model concentrate on quality continuously and assure quality team ownership for the product. The rational unified process model assists scope, it is pre-evaluated in advance, and it is recorded in the document of scope whereas a process known as project backlog is utilized instead of scope in scrum and it enhances the backlogs to be re-estimated at the last stage of each sprint. The artifacts that scrum model assist is operational software whereas the rational unified process model involves numerous artifacts like scope document or vision, system architecture document, test scripts, formal functional requirements package and test plan. The below table shows the difference between RUP and SCRUM:
Reference
Collaris, R. A and Dekker, E. (2010). Scrum and RUP-A Comparison Doesn't Go on All
Fours. Agile Record, The magazine for agile developers and agile tester
