Collage
Abstract
This paper clearly discusses the reasons why there is still war in Iraq. Over the past 20 years, war has been a major issue in Iraq. The western states such as the United States have spent most of their time in the Middle East countries such as Iraq as a result of the war. Since the 9/11 tragedy in the United States of America, Iraq has been a major target by America in collaboration with other states in Europe. The major idea was to look for terrorists that have been a key threat to the world. However, conspiracy theory reviews that Middle East states such as Iraq has much fuel that is supplied globally by the state administration. Based on research, America claims that they are in control of the oil that is produced in Iraq. According to BBC, it is clear that America has influenced sanctions that have highly affected financial system of Iraq. As a result, Iraq resolved to declare war on both America and European states such as China because their major mission is to overthrow the state.
Keywords:Iraq, oil,OPEC, War, Middle East, and America.
Introduction
Over the past 20 years or so, war has been a major issue in Iraq. The western states such as the United States have spent much of their time in the Middle East countries such as Iraq as a result of the war. Since the 9/11 attack in the United States of America, Iraq has been a major target by America in collaboration with other states in Europe. The major idea was to look for terrorists that have been a key threat to the world. However, conspiracy theory reviews that Middle East states such as Iraq has much fuel that is supplied globally by the state administration. Iraq is the largest state that produces oil, and it earns most of the world's currency. As a result of earning huge currency, America and European states collaborated in order to prevent further Organizations of Petroleum Exports Countries (OPEC) thrust towards the euro as an oil transaction exchange standard. However, in order for America and Europe to pre-empt OPEC, they required to gain geostrategic mechanism/control of Iraq and its largest proven oil reserves.
As a result, theorists such as Thomas Jefferson came up with the real reasons for the upcoming war with Iraq. Most people globally are convinced that Iraq is full of terrorists and their mission is to conquer the world. However, that is not the whole truth; neither part of the story told is true (ZHDANNIKOV, 2014). The 9/11 attack was a strategy to get to the Middle East countries and control the oil. First, American researchers investigated the reason American government resolved to cause war in the Middle East states. There are many questions behind the issue of conflict in Iraq. The 9/11 attack was a major strategy that influenced war in Iraq. The Bush administration was behind attacks that occurred in America. Soon after the 9/11 attack, the Bush Administration deployed military in the Middle East states (HALL, 2013). This approach was planned because the military targeted the oil reserves and areas that were suspect of having oil. Reports show that American military stole gallons of oil. This was clear evidence why America deployed military in the Middle East (GONZALEZ, 2012).
Based on research, America claims that they are in control of the oil that is produced in Iraq. Based on reports by BBC, it is clear that America has influenced sanctions that have highly affected the financial system of Iraq. As a result, Iraq resolved to declare war on both America and European states such as China because their major mission is to overthrow the state. According to Moore, it is clear that Russia and China support the lethal acts by America of stealing oil from the Middle East states (MOOR, 2014). This approach has negatively affected the economy of Iraq in more than a few ways. As a result, the administration of Iraq has declared total war against America because their major purpose is to control the oil mines. Moore clearly states that by the year 2035, America will produce their petroleum because they continue to steal oil from the Middle East. As a result, this approach has influenced increased war and deaths in Iraq. In the year 2013, the American government imposed further sanctions aimed at Iraq’s oil and petrochemical sections (CLÔ, 2010).
In addition, the American administration imposed hefty sanctions on the shipping trade and blacklisted the global network front organizations that were controlled by Iraq leaders. The American government blacklisted the organization by accusing them of hiding assets and generating billion of revenues (in dollars) (ZHDANNIKOV, 2014). Other states that have imposed hefty sanctions against Iraq include Japan and South Korea. According to Pizzi, it is evident that these sanctions and embargo targeting Iraq’s oil exports have declined to approximately 700,000 barrels each day(PIZZI, 2014). As a result of the drop in the oil revenues in Iraq, war continues to be a major factor in the state. This factor has negatively affected the growth and development of the state because the only major factor within the state is total war. However, American administration continues to steal oil from Iraq, a major factor that continues to trigger a war in the Middle East states (BBC, 2014).
Today, America has dominated Iraq not because they are terrorists, but their mission is to control the oil wells and ensure that their dollar has power over other currencies globally. The European states such China in collaboration with China and Japan, are behind the attacks that America has made in Iraq. The U.S. administration argues that their mission is to eliminate the weapons of mass destructions that are used by Iraq to execute terrorism. However, the media has criticized these arguments and proved through filming and photographs of what American military do in Iraq. A number of questions have been raised by human activists based on the issue of killing innocent civilians in Iraq. There have been several footages showing the impact of war that is still ongoing in Iraq. In general, oil continues to be transported to America through aircraft, private ships, and pipes. However, Iraq only fights for its rights, the right to own land and manage their resources without intervention (BBC2014).
Conclusion
It is evident that oil determines America and European financial system in the Middle East. "Peak Oil" was the largest subject that forced America to target Middle East states. There were claims that oil in Japan was little. In addition, other claims of Oil Peak were projected to occur in the year 2010. This was an indication that states such America that relied on oil would suffer end decline in term of economy. In that case, it is evident that the Americans and European states resolved to take action of stealing oil. The whole issue was political, and the target of Middle East states was not sensible. The United States mission was to rescue the dollar that gradually becoming weaker and weaker as a result of the oil in Iraq. As a result, United States believed that Iraq would be the next most powerful state globally. Today, America is still in Iraq in search of oil. However, since the 9/11 attack, war in Iraq is still in progress. The state continues to fight for their resources because they know the true mission of America is not revenge, but is to take the oil that belong to them.
References
BBC. (2014). Iran Sanctions. BBC News Middle East. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-15983302
CLÔ, A. (2010). Oil economics and policy. Boston [u.a.], Kluwer Acad. Publ.
GONZALEZ, A., (2012). Expanding Oil Drilling Helps U.S. Wean Itself from Middle East. The Wall Street Journal
HALL, T. E. (2013). The rotten fruits of economic controls and the rise from the ashes, 1965-1989. Lanham, MD, University Press of America.
MOOR, M., (2014). China, Russia, and the Waning Demand for Canadian Oil. Alberta Oil. The Buisness Energy. Retrieved from http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2014/08/closing-gateway-asia/
PIZZI, M., (2014). Russia, China sign deal to bypass U.S. Dollar. Retrieved from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/5/20/russia-china-bankdeal.html
ZHDANNIKOV, D., (2014). Rosneft May Back Out of Morgan Stanley Oil Unit Deal: Sources. Reuters. Print. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/25/us-morgan-stanley-rosneft-idUSKCN0HK0D320140925
