It would be correct to opine on my part that the post in context explicates the ads with proper analysis and criticism. The post comes across to be quite comprehensive with description of the ads as one gets to know about them holistically. The qualitative analysis of the ads in context is truly commendable due to the fact that the individual attributes of the ads are taken into reckoning while penning the post. As such, one gets to have an insight about visual argument that is presented in the advertisements in context. The post goes on to analyze the ads as per the modes of persuasion that are used to engage the audience to the subject matter and get the message across with propriety. Thus, an objective attitude by the writer and a proper analysis of the ads renders this post the attribute of being insightful and explorative of the specific elements used in making the contextual advertisements. The logical, ethical and emotional aspects of the ads are properly delved into in the course of the writing in context.
Hence, it would be right to say that I agree with the explication provided by the writer of the contextual post. I support the in-depth analysis that is conspicuous in the course of the writing on the visual ads. The analysis is persuasive with proper description of the intricate details that work to make the ads successful. The writer has employed a careful eye in ascertaining and explaining the various related factors that come into play while presenting the advertisements. Steven, the writer of the post, correctly interprets the possible impact of the ads on the audience. The succinct analysis of the writer makes one understand the ways in which the ads in context could persuade the people seeing them. The sheer power of visual data and argumentation is properly described and analyzed in the writing in context.
Bibliography
Steven, “Thread Post”, Text.
