Introduction
Development of an essential communication platform is imperative in the maintenance of influential communication channels within organizations. In the case presented, the higher number of nodes within the network creates the need to develop address assignments based on a topological hierarchy. Through this advancement, there is an assurance that the domains obtain a defined address block from other domains placed at a higher level in the hierarchy. This provision will only be possible if the address fields in the address system are divided into sections. The essence of this alternative is to ascertain that each level in the in the topology is represented with a common address tag. In simple terms, this initiative can be used to create an understanding of the nodes situated at different geographical positions. Owing to the fact that members of the organization are split within different departments, this is the most effective initiative to capture the data sharing requirements on a shared link.
Analyze the functional problems of throughput, delay and packet loss as it pertains to your plan
Because the organization has a large population, the network will most likely suffer from multiple issues during data transmission. Precisely, the fact that a shared link is used to transmit data using the Real Time Protocol and the Transmission Control Protocol, utilization of either channels compromises the effectiveness of the other (Cheung, Mohsenian, Wong & Schober, 2010). For starters, when large files are transferred within the network, there is utilization of higher bandwidth levels. This affects the efficiency of the Real time protocol since data latency is imminent. As such, actions such as video conferencing would be throttled due to the bottleneck created by bias utilization of the throughput by the TCP (Rashvad & Kavian, 2012). Lower performance of the inelastic traffic implies that a delay in actions such as multimedia transfer affects the efficiency of the data transferred. Moreover, there would be large packet loss since the channel lacks an effective bandwidth distribution platform. This is largely accredited to the fact that TCP connections have no bandwidth limit since data transmitted through the channel can be spread in time, elastic traffic (Kouvatsos, 2009). On the other hand, RTP has time relevance thus lower bandwidth allocation would affect performance.
Analyze and explain how you would use DNS in your plan
As mentioned earlier, a hierarchical scheme would be used to represent the nodes within the organizations. Precisely, the scheme would encompass the division of the organization into two sections that contain five hundred employees at different tiers. Each level would have a section of the address specific to the hierarchy class and the section it is located. In simple terms, each level of the hierarchy would have its section in the IP address and the final value would be assigned to individual nodes at each level. As such, once information is requested from the common data center, it would be routed to a specific address faster than it would have if the naming scheme was random. This initiative would make it easier for the system to handle each request with lower latency and enhance the relevance of information conveyed on the RTP (Rashvand & Kavian, 2012). As such, inelastic traffic would be more efficient in spite of the challenges posed in a shared network.
Compose two paragraphs executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.
The size of the organization in this case compels the network administrators to utilize different types of traffic. This is largely accredited to the fact that different communication protocols would be utilized to transmit data between nodes. As such, elastic and inelastic traffic would be created within the channels. When these traffics are used in the same challenge, they throttle the each other’s performance due to the differences in the methods used to convey the data and the relevance attached to each data type. This address and naming model is intentioned to avert the challenges associated with shared links in the transmission of data that requires time relevance and those that do not. Nonetheless, some challenges like compromised throughput through utilization of one traffic model affect the productivity of this initiative. As such, the plan is intentioned to categorize the organizational layout into two major sections. This initiative relieves the data transmission stress experienced by nodes in the lower levels of the hierarchy.
The common data center shared among the multiple departments in the organization would be accessed through the utilization of special IP addresses. Precisely, when a node requests for a certain domain, the system browses the position of the node through the naming scheme based on the hierarchy. In simple terms, each section of the domain name represents a level in the hierarchy. As such, it is comparatively easier for the system to route information to the receiver node as opposed to a random naming scheme. To ascertain that the performance of the network is pleasant, specific allocation of bandwidth to certain communication channels would not be done since this limits the performance of requests performed in inelastic traffic (Kouvatsos, 2009). Consequently, this plan is essential as it fosters relevance, timeliness and data security.
References
Cheung, M., Mohsenian-Rad, A., Wong, V., & Schober, R. (2010). Random access for elastic and inelastic traffic in WLANs. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(6), 1861-186
Kouvatsos, D. (2009). Traffic and performance engineering for heterogeneous networks. Aalborg, Denmark: River Publishers. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/twc.2010.06.091497
Rashvand, H., & Kavian, Y. (2012). Using cross-layer techniques for communication systems. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
