Introduction
The English contract law consists of a body of rules that control contacts in England, with its foundation based on the intense activities of the judiciary that took place in the industrial revolution. It is critical to mention that the law shares some of its core elements with the commonwealth countries such as Australia and Canada. However, the law had for long been undergoing influences of the European Union during the period that the UK has been a member until this year when it withdrew the membership of the European body. The English law perceives people who enter into agreements that are legally binding as having committed to contracts. This part forms part of the introduction and provides the information that lays the groundwork for the research.
Main body
The English law upholds and protects voluntary commitments by ensuring that the people consent to transactions that are legally binding. It is important to mention that the contracts happen when an individual makes an offer while another accepts through communication to the effect that the offer has been accepted. The contract law rules apply when the agreement is entered and functions appropriately when the parties involved know their duties and rights. Nonetheless, there are situations that make the contract hard or impossible to implement compelling the courts to intervene to determine the obligations of the parties involved. The interventions could also result from the fact that one of the parties violated the terms of the contract upon which the innocent party sues for damages. This section provides critical information of the main body.
The conflict of law rules for the English courts on contracts borrows heavily from the EU states. The regulations apply to the issue of civil and commercial issues such as regulation 593/2008 on the contractual commitments and 864/2007 on the no contractual roles. The law of 1990, which endorsed the Rome Convention of 1980, is quite significant regarding all contracts agreed before 17th December 2009 with the Rome in rules applicable to all the contracts reached on or after the date. The private international law act of 1995, which is a different provision, is quite useful but only regarding the contexts which are not catered by Rome II rules. The traditional common law rules are applied in the issues regarding the defamation and the property inheritance law.
The EU regulations do not include the use of the renvoi doctrine in the cases controlled by the EU. In the cases regarded contract commitments and roles that include the law choice, the Rome 1 rules are automatically used. The decision on the law rules in EU regulations could also apply to the cases not recognized by the English domestic law as contract cases. A good example is in the cases where the agreement has got no support of supporting documents that are legally binding.
The function of the renvoi in the other sectors of law is quite limited and ambiguous in the other jurisdictions. The concept of the renvoi is used on matters of property located abroad to enhance the possibility that the decision in England regarding the property, is comprehensively efficient. Regarding tangible property, located in the EU countries, there is a reference made to the effect that lex situs does not consist of the concept of renvoi. The connection factor issue is resolved through the specification of every choice of the regulation law about the time when the problem is identified. The issue is particularly prominent in the transfers of the property where the use of law recognizes the location of the property under consideration during the transfer.
The Rome 1 and II rules offer a chance for the application of the overriding compulsory regulations of the forum in spite of the law that is used in the contract under consideration. The provisions appear in the consumer and the labor areas or in the laws that support the international conventions. The material of foreign law is proved like a fact which implies that it is upon the parties involved to demonstrate that there is content in the EU law. The judges are not allowed to investigate the substance of the EU regulations on their own. If there is a contradiction between the evidence presented by aggrieved individuals the judge could be compelled to seek the opinion of the professionals. As a result, he could be allowed to assess the basic evidence, for example, if such evidence is written in English and makes use of the ideas that an English judge is conversant with. This is the section that composes of the main body of the research and gives all the details salient to the research.
Conclusion
The substance of any EU law must be proved through the application of the professional evidence. As such, it is not just about the words of a foreign statute, the case or the statement of authority before the judges. The expert evidence on the EU law may be provided by anyone who has the necessary experience irrespective of the fact that if the individual is a qualified legal practitioner in the jurisdiction under consideration. Usually, the experts are practicing academicians and practitioners within the jurisdictions of the court. In case the substance of the EU law has been made in the earlier English situation then judges can quote the case as evidence of the statement of the foreign laws. In such a case the substance of the international law will be considered as determined in the earlier cases except where there is an emergence of fresh evidence. Therefore the burden of Proof is left to the party applying the foreign law. However if the said EU law is not exhaustively proved, then the regulation observes that the English rule is employed. If the court holds the opinion that the international law is not similar to the English one, then such a suit becomes the subject of a summary dismissal.
In all the cases touching on contracts where there is need to make a choice of law then, the Rome 1 rules are automatically employed. The selection of the code regulations could also be applied to cases involving cases that are not considered contractual by the English domestic law. The evaluation of some damages and the ways to prove are controlled by the legislation of the forum. The case of a contract responsibility and the substantively limited periods are influenced by the law used in the rules. In the customer and labor contracts, the choice of the law should not deny the customers or the workers the defense of the regulations existing in the law if the situation was not a selection of the law applicable to the case. Other protective rules exist about the insurance contracts. In the event of coercion then the relevant law would be applicable assuming that there was no duress in the first instance. The conclusion provides the overview of the contents discussed in the main body as a necessary component of the main points discussed.
References
Books
A. Davidson, The Law of Electronic Commerce (1st, Cambridge University Press, London 2009) 52
CHRIS Woodruff and others, Comparative Study of “Residual Jurisdiction” In Civil and Commercial Disputes in the Eu National Report For: England (1 edn, Cambridge University Press 2002) 10
C. Kilpatrick, The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies, Volume 6 (1st, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2004) 188
n/a, Chitty on Contracts, 31st edition volume 1 (1st, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2188)
D. Fairgrieve, E. Lein, Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress (1st, OUP Oxford, Oxford 2012) 149
D. Patterson, A. Sodersten, A Companion to European Union Law and International Law (1st, John Wiley & Sons, New York 2016) 388
F.G. Jacobs, The Sovereignty of Law: The European Way (1st, Cambridge University Press, London 2007) 23
Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: European Union Committee, European Small Claims Procedure: Report with Evidence; 23rd Report of Session 2005-06 (1st, The Stationery Office, London 2006) 96
H. Smith, England and Wales: The jurisdiction of choice (1st, Norton Rose, London 2012) 5
OUP USA
J. Meeusen, Enforcement of International Contracts in the European Union: Convergence and Divergence Between Brussels I and Rome I (1st, Intersentia nv, Brussels 2004) 105
L. E. Gillies, Electronic Commerce and International Private Law: A Study of Electronic Consumer Contract (1st, Routledge, London 2016) 89
O. W. Holmes, The Common Law (1st, Courier Corporation, London 2013) 25
P. Doris, ' Enforcement of Foreign Judgment - United Kingdom ' [2014] L.B.R 124, 132
R. Folsom, R. B. Lake, V. P. Nanda, European Union Law After Maastricht:Practical Guide for Lawyers Outside the Common Market (1st, Kluwer Law International, Oxford 1996) 47
T. C. Hartley, International Commercial Litigation: Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law (1st, Cambridge University Press, London 2015) 888
T. Kono, C. Paulus, H. Rajak, Selected Legal Issues of E-Commerce (1st, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2002) 148
Z. S. Tang, Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements in International Commercial Law (1st, Routledge, London 2014) 215
Online sources
European Parliament , ' Possibility and terms for applying Brussels I Regulation (recast) to extraEU disputes ' ( Legal and Parliamentary Affairs 2014) < http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/493024/IPOL-JURI_ET(2014)493024_EN.pdf> accessed 24/12/2016
J. O'Brien, International Law (1st, Routledge, London 2001) 259L. Steven, ' ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN ENGLAND' ( Steven Loble 2016) < http://www.loble.co.uk/enforcement_of_foreign_judgments.html> accessed 26/12/2016
Slaughter and May, 'Brexit Essentials: The Legal and Business Implication of the UK Leaving the EU' (Slaughter and May 2016) < http://www.slaughterandmay.com/media/2535439/brexit-essentials-the-legal-and-business-implications-of-the-uk-leaving-the-eu.pdf> accessed 24/12/2016
