Sample Essay On Primary Care

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, R. M. (2013, September ). Most primary care diagnostic errors stem from process breakdowns during the clinical encounter: Patient Safety and Quality. Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/newsletters/research-activities
The chief care setting is especially susceptible to diagnostic mistakes ranging from missed, postponed, and even erroneous diagnosis . Using electronic health report triggers to spot diagnostic mistakes at two primary care spots, researchers found that greatest missed diagnoses were for shared conditions that include pneumonia, worsening congestive heart failure, acute renal failure, cancer, urinary tract infection, among others. Moreover, procedure breakdowns during the patient-practitioner medical visits were accountable for most of the blunders. The research was carried out in the chief care clinics, in a huge city, Veterans Affairs facility as well as a privately governed health care system. During the whole process, it was discovered that 190 diagnostic inaccuracies and a further 68 different concern types of medical conditions were at play. It was also clarified that almost 80 percent of errors that took place during the clinical visits.. These included issues inclusive of medical chronicle, physical examination, and also ordering of indicative tests. Other process malfunctions away from the patient-practitioner clinical encounter entailed referral manners, patient-related issues, follow-up of diagnostic test outcome information, and deducing test results.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, R. M. (2013, October). Potential Measures for Clinical-Community Relationships: A Supplement to the Clinical-Community Relationships Measures Atlas. Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-car
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has set a long-term intent of comprehending whether advancing relationships between clinical disciplines and community organizations is a useful and possible way to improve the provision of particular clinical preventive services. In doing so, they presented an inventory of existing methods for gauging the organization, developments, and results related with clinical-community relationships for prevention. The methods are arranged in accordance with a measurement framework directed by the relationships between clinicians, patients, and community resources. The framework has 56 domains; though a literature search found no existing measures in 46 of those domains.
In this article, the researchers propose 52 possible measures that could be promoted to fill the gaps in measurements for those domains. This report also suggests a central collection of 13 measures that indicate a decision about which measures may be the most effective and possible for eminent enhancement and program assessment. The 52 possible measures can offer an initial point for potential measure expansion and alteration work in the perspective of exclusive program performance efforts, quality development programmes. Several of these measures may also be pertinent for broader use in gauging clinical-community relationships for a more extensive set of services.