Sample Question & Answer On Group Inhibitions Of Bystander Intervention In Emergencies

The primary hypothesis of the study of “Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies” was to see if people would see smoke filling the room as an immediate danger and help others by intervening during an emergency or if they would behave in a passive way whether there were others in a room or whether they were alone in a room.
The independent variable in the “Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies” was the people who were there along with the smoke filling the room. They were either there by themselves or in a group. The smoke filling the room was also an independent variable.
The dependent variable was a person’s sense of urgency and whether or not they would be able to get people out of the smoke filling area or how the people reacted to smoke filling the room in the case of a possible emergency that could be dangerous. In some instances, this could be based on a person’s abilities or their age to be able to help other bystanders.
Generally, in this study, the people behaved as the researchers seem to have anticipated in their hypothesis and many took responsibility in the case of the emergency when others were in the room. Some people were more passive in their response to the smoke filling the room.
The hypothesis was somewhat supported depending on which person was involved in trying to help others. In some instances, yes, it was but it is inconclusive because not everyone will be have the same way.
It seems as though that before a person can determine whether or not they can help, they have to be aware of the situation and be willing to take responsibility for their actions in order to help others. Some people were apathetic but it also depended on whether or not a person actually perceived the smoke filling a room as an actual emergency.