Question One
The National Military Strategy (NMS) outlines how the U.S. employs its military forces to advance and protect national interests. Security agencies must be in a position to rapidly adapt to emerging threats while also maintaining comparative advantage over the existing ones. In most instances, success depends on how the military instruments can support other instruments of power and facilitate other networks of partners and allies. On the other hand, the U.S. Joint Forces Command was a unified combatant command that provided particular services to the military. The Joint Forces’ mission that aligns with and supports the National Security Strategy is protecting the U.S homeland and forces overseas.
The mission to protect the U.S homeland, as well as overseas forces, aligns with and supports the National Security Strategy because it outlines some of the tactics that the U.S. security forces employ to protect Americans citizens and interests. The Joint Forces Command endeavoured to avert and interrupt terrorist plans and strategies by reinforcing homeland security to keep American citizen safe while bolstering our national resilience. The mission supports the National Security Strategy in the sense that it is concerned with ensuring that the U.S. interests, property, and citizen and fully protected from internal and external aggressors.
The key player in the United States’ Force Structure is the U.S. President. Ideally, the president leads the chain of command and has the exclusive powers to act promptly on various issues with consent from the Congress. For example, the president is responsible for ensuring that all U.S. citizens are protected. Furthermore, he can order the security or military officers to use particular resources during a war. He is also responsible for giving war orders to the military, which may entail providing direct commands to field commanders.
Question Two
Biases refer to prejudices against or in favour of an individual, item, or group compared to another, often in a manner that is regarded unfair. Over the years, I have witnessed numerous instances of bias or prejudice as well as cases where biases influenced an individual’s actions. For example, there are particular things that men are forbidden from doing. Similarly, women were prohibited from engaging in certain responsibilities that were designated for men. Such regulations have given rise to gender stereotypes that are entrenched in contemporary societies.
One day when our department was preparing an advertisement that was meant for audio-visual media, as well as other social maid platforms, one of my colleagues suggested that we should use my voice and face in the advert to avoid unnecessary expenses related to hiring another individual to market our departmental services. Most of my colleagues supported the idea; however, our supervisor suggested that the department should use a female model as well as female voice to market the services. He asserted that using an attractive female model will entice many people to watch the advertisement. Furthermore, he intimated that advertisements are more appealing when they involve females than when they involve males.
In this scenario, it is evident that the supervisor holds the stereotype that for advertisements to be more effective, beautiful women must be involved. The bias is based on the perception that women, especially models, are generally beautiful and attractive. Furthermore, they have appealing voices. Therefore, whenever they are used in adverts, they are more likely to appeal to clients. The perspective is flawed because people often watch or listen to adverts, irrespective of whether the personalities involved are considered beautiful or not. The standpoint also underlines that fact that the supervisor believes that advertisements are only effective when they incorporate particular feminine aspects.
