The simulation production analysis of Baldwin’s team is as follows; during the period, the team had a relatively high percentage of overall sales with 10% being profits. In the stock and bonds it registered quiet high values like in the close, change, market cap, book value, dividend and a competitive percentage as yield. Its closing stock increased steadily from $25 in 2012 to $175 in 2020 an indication that there was improvement each year. The summery of its bond market also increased in yield steadily in the subsequent years. Its financial summary in the cash flow statement survey depicted a tremendous development without any form of retarded growth. The net cash was not good enough perhaps because of the high values in the accounts payable.
On the other hand, the financial summary on balance sheet survey indicated that this team had the highest assets summing up to $215,615. This was a result of the high figures on the account receivable which was the highest amongst them all. This later reflected to the Production Analysis where the team had a capacity of 7000 and managed to produce 13000 which was one of the highest production values amongst the teams. Traditional statistics indicated that it had a relatively high accessibility which actually doubled that of other groups and this led to a high market share of 25%. This is an indication that the values manifested down to both the low and high end segment analysis including performance analysis.
At the end of the survey, the team had a potential average market share of 24.4% although it managed only 23.4%. However, it had the highest market share amongst all the teams. Eventually, the annual report of the 2020 financial year indicated that Baldwin’s team had managed a total of $34,699 as indicated in the income statement with 10.3% as the common size. It managed to beat all the other groups in its production.
