This paper is set to explain aims and claims of Nussbaum on the claims on liberalism. This paper will define and interpret Nussbaum’s claims through interpretation. It will also focus on the interference that can be claimed from the writings of Nussbaum. This will reflect her work as a philosopher and her claims of liberalism. Nussbaum’s philosophical knowledge may be well contested in the context of socialism. This takes longer than many of the teachings as they slowly reunited in this works. The claims exhibited through her philosophical knowledge draws certain questions of social ethic. The writer puts more emphasis in the claims made for example; the liberalism does not contain individuals. This exerts pressure as it determines the methodology in reference to the text which affects the whole part. Her description and unrealistic approach to liberalism is what makes her work stand out.
Liberalism expresses that each human being has individual interest that are greatly influenced by the interests of other people. The biggest interference in this case would be to embrace socialism where the desires of all are intertwined to be one. Liberalism tends to disregard differences between persons that are a product of history and social setting. By viewing that all are equal does not satisfy the equation of the social setting. This in liberalism components is greatly upheld that social hierarchy must be taken into account to provide for sanity in the universe. Women’s rights in liberalism are not well looked into and in the core commitments liberalism needs to look into treatment of marginalized groups. This liberal ideas are all enhanced by the perfection of the new world in comparison to the fact that liberalism is termed to be too individualistic. The feminist approach to the subject where there are certain facts that need to be looked into from women’s hunger, domestic violence and marital rape. Liberalism has been transformed from traditional to modern where the thoughts of the feminist are well heard and adhered to. An interference that may greatly affect such a claim in liberalism is the use of modern law to exert pressure on women’s rights this will improve on the sensitization to the rest of society.
If the liberalism claims that each human has desires and interest and can be separately fulfilled then it is evident that an original position must be established. In this case individuals in order to fulfill their interests must create a foundation of desire. If liberalism disregard of differences between persons that are a product of history and social setting makes it adopt an unacceptably formal conception of equal treatment, then there would be no crop of leadership that would strive to bring law and order. If liberalism holds that all human beings are equal and are above all reasoning beings then why does the marginalizing of women both politically and socially still consistent. Women’s rights should be taken seriously in order to consider them as whole human beings with capacity.
Nussbaum might relate well to the inferences above as she understood and took into account the major challenges faced in such instances. She may find it challenging but most of the inferences are well agreed with her work on liberalism. Her stand on human rights and the existence of women’s rights is a well adjusted and acceptable in the society. She embraces the differences brought about by liberalisms and incorporates such imagery and truth to the facts. Lastly, she will agree on the inferences to this claims and this will improve and challenge her work by providing a sense of better knowledge.
Works cited
Nussbaum, Martha. "The feminisy critique of liberalism." n.d.
