The main point of divergence between Eastern and Western religion is the belief in number of deities or gods (Eshleman, 2008). Eastern religions are polytheistic, believing in the existence of several deities. Western religion on the other hand is monotheistic, believing that only one god exits. In Eastern religion, each of the deities controls one or two phenomenon, while in Western religion one god controls everything. Zoroastrianism acts as a link between these religions in the sense that though it is monotheistic, it propounds that there are two forces, good and evil (Hartz, 2009). These forces act against one another, with the deity largely not being involved.
Though it is difficult to state the exact time of origin of Zoroastrianism, there is a general consensus that it predates most of the contemporary world religions. Accordingly, most of these religions have beliefs and concept mirroring those propounded by Zoroastrianism. For instance, the belief in good and evil, and especially the tussle between the two, cuts across all religion today, its origin is attributable to Zoroastrianism. Similarly, the idea of a savior, emphasized by Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, has also its origin in Zoroastrianism.
In addition, most religions believe in a final judgment, a good place for those adjudged good (heaven) and a bad place for those adjudged bad (hell), all these concepts have their roots in Zoroastrianism. Accordingly, to the extent that these concepts form fundamental beliefs for most contemporary religions, it is safe and logical to conclude that Zoroastrianism heavily influenced these religions.
Zoroastrianism has drawn renewed interest to date due to its uniqueness and appealing concepts, providing a refreshing alternative to the existing religions. Key among these appealing concepts is its emphasis on individual moral accountability in making the world a better place. To such extent, it is not withdrawn from the world, unlike other contemporary religions. Additionally, its belief that life should be enjoyed to the fullest while at the same time progressing to other levels as opposed to remaining static (Kambiz, 2000), provides a sense of hope in the future.
References
Eshleman, A. (2008). Readings in Philosophy of Religion: East meets West. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing. Print.
Hartz, P. (2009). Zoroastrianism (3rd Ed). New York: Infobase Publishing Co. Print.
Kambiz, S. (2000). Communicative Reason and Medieval Iranian Thought. Indiana: 1st Books
Library. Print.
